AP textbooks for Physics and Calculus

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for textbooks and study strategies for AP exams in calculus and physics, specifically AP Calculus (AB and BC), AP Physics 1, AP Physics 2, and AP Physics C (Electricity and Magnetism and Mechanics). Participants share their experiences and suggest resources to help prepare for these exams.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the sufficiency of a calculus book by Ron Larson for AP Calculus preparation.
  • Another asks if "Fundamentals of Physics Extended" by Halliday and Resnick covers all necessary material for the AP physics exams.
  • Some participants suggest that Larson's book is adequate for AP Calculus, while recommending "Giancoli Physics for Scientists and Engineers" for physics preparation.
  • There is mention of more advanced texts like "Spivak" for calculus and "Kolenkow and Kleppner" for mechanics, with a note that these require a higher level of understanding.
  • Recommendations for AP Physics 1 and 2 include "College Physics" by Geller & Young and "Serway/Vuille," with some expressing concerns about the latter's negative reviews.
  • For AP Physics C, "Halliday/Resnick" is noted as a comprehensive resource, with the regular version suggested over the extended edition.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of focusing on AP Physics C for advanced credit, suggesting that studying for Physics 1 and 2 may not be necessary if one plans to take Physics C.
  • Several participants express varying opinions on the difficulty of achieving a score of 5 on the AP exams and the implications of choosing between Calculus AB and BC.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the adequacy of certain textbooks for AP Calculus and Physics, but there are differing opinions on the necessity of studying for both Physics 1+2 versus just Physics C. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take for the AP exams and the relative difficulty of the courses.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the varying levels of detail and understanding required for different textbooks, indicating that the choice of resources may depend on individual learning styles and goals. There are also unresolved questions about the comparative difficulty of the AP exams and the implications of scoring.

Who May Find This Useful

Students preparing for AP exams in calculus and physics, educators seeking textbook recommendations, and individuals interested in self-study strategies for advanced placement courses.

Maddie1609
Messages
81
Reaction score
11
Hi,

I'm studying on my own for AP exams a year from now and need some advice on which books to get. I'm taking AP calculus (AB or BC, haven't decided yet), AP Physics 1, AP Physics 2, AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism, and AP Physics C: Mechanics. I already have a Calculus book by Ron Larson, is this sufficient to prepare for the calculus exam?

Also, should I take AB or BC? Is BC a lot harder? Will universities be more forgiving of the score if I take BC over AB? Is it extremely hard to get a 5 in these exams? I've never taken an AP exam (or course).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does Fundamentals of Physics Extended by Halliday and Resnick (10th edition) cover everything in the AP physics exams?
 
Larson should be enough for ap calculus. Not sure for physics, but giancoli physics scientist and engineers, would cover what you need at that level. Out college introductory text cover the same msterial. It should not really matter if your aim is to pass ap test.
 
MidgetDwarf said:
Larson should be enough for ap calculus. Not sure for physics, but giancoli physics scientist and engineers, would cover what you need at that level. Out college introductory text cover the same msterial. It should not really matter if your aim is to pass ap test.
Thanks, I ordered fundamentals of physics extended, hopefully it's enough for at least AP Physics 1 and 2. What so you mean? Why shouldn't it matter? :smile:
 
Because you can go into more detail, such as, spivak for calculus and kolenkow and kleppner for mechanices. However, these books require a level of maturity. Spivak is more theoretical and sure you will understand calculus, but the ap exam is more about technique ie applying a formula, then it is about understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Maddie1609
Does anyone know which books are good for AP physics 1 and 2 and both AP physics C exams?
 
AP Physics 1+2 are largely algebra-based and I would recommend College Physics by Geller & Young (used in high school, received a "5" on AP Physics B test). Another strong alternative is Serway/Vuille.

AP Physics C is calculus-based and Halliday/Resnick is a great book for that (regular version covers both Mech. and E&M, so it is comprehensive, no need for extended)
My high school used Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Giancoli - i thought the book was great. Either book will prepare you well for the AP Physics C Test.

I think you should just study for AP Calculus and Physics C. Physics C gives you the advanced credit that Physics 1+2 would not. Physics 1+2 covers more topics and would be a waste of time if you were to just pass out of Physics C (Physics 1+2 covers waves, optics, heat, not covered in either Physics C test).

For Calculus AB/BC (took BC), any of the books by the following authors would be fine.
Larson, Hostetler, Edwards (you have this, so use this - great book)
Rogawski
Stewart
Thomas (used in high school)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Maddie1609
Dexter K said:
AP Physics 1+2 are largely algebra-based and I would recommend College Physics by Geller & Young (used in high school, received a "5" on AP Physics B test). Another strong alternative is Serway/Vuille.

AP Physics C is calculus-based and Halliday/Resnick is a great book for that (regular version covers both Mech. and E&M, so it is comprehensive, no need for extended)
My high school used Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Giancoli - i thought the book was great. Either book will prepare you well for the AP Physics C Test.

I think you should just study for AP Calculus and Physics C. Physics C gives you the advanced credit that Physics 1+2 would not. Physics 1+2 covers more topics and would be a waste of time if you were to just pass out of Physics C (Physics 1+2 covers waves, optics, heat, not covered in either Physics C test).

For Calculus AB/BC (took BC), any of the books by the following authors would be fine.
Larson, Hostetler, Edwards (you have this, so use this - great book)
Rogawski
Stewart
Thomas (used in high school)
Thank you so much! Great advice, I actually think I'll just take Physics C then :D Saves me some money and stress, and give me more time to focus on physics c and calculus. Thanks again!
 
Dexter K said:
AP Physics 1+2 are largely algebra-based and I would recommend College Physics by Geller & Young (used in high school, received a "5" on AP Physics B test). Another strong alternative is Serway/Vuille.

I seem to recall there was something I didn't like about that Serway book. Oh yes, it gets tons of negative reviews.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K