Apparent power, true power, reactive power and power factor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculations of apparent power (S), true power (P), reactive power (Q), and power factor in AC circuits. The user calculated S as 17684.5 at an angle of 135 degrees, resulting in a rectangular form of -1261.83 + j1261.83. The confusion arises from the sign of the true power, where the marking instructions indicate a positive 1261.83 instead of the user's negative value. The discussion clarifies that the sign of power depends on the reference direction chosen for current and voltage, emphasizing that true power (P) should always be positive in the context of loads.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC circuit theory
  • Familiarity with complex numbers in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of power factor calculations
  • Experience with phasor representation of voltages and currents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of phasor diagrams in AC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of power factor correction techniques
  • Explore the differences between inductive and capacitive loads in power calculations
  • Investigate the role of sign conventions in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying AC circuit theory, and professionals involved in power system analysis will benefit from this discussion.

nothing909
Messages
168
Reaction score
4
I calculated the apparent power, true power, reactive power and power factor by using:

S=VI
S=17684.5 at an angle of 135

In rectangular, that's = -1261.83+j1261.83This is probably a stupid question, but I have

S= 17684.5
P= - 1261.83
Q=1261.83

power factor = -0.707

In the marking instructions, it has the real power (P) as 1261.83 instead of what I've got - NEGATIVE 1261.83

Also, the power factor in the marking instructions is 0.707, not negative 0.707. When I calculate the power factor by simply doing cos(135, I get a negative.

Do I just not include the negatives or what, I don't understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nothing909 said:
S=17684.5 at an angle of 135

135 relative to what?

You get to choose the direction of +I which determines the direction of +P. If you don't like the sign, choose the other direction.
 
anorlunda said:
135 relative to what?

You get to choose the direction of +I which determines the direction of +P. If you don't like the sign, choose the other direction.
So my answers are correct, it can be - or +?
 
nothing909 said:
So my answers are correct, it can be - or +?
it also depends on whether you are talking about power supplied or power used.

If you are referring to a load, saying it has -700W used is wrong (in most cases). Make sure it is correct in the context of the question asked.
 
In my opinion if 135 degrees is the angle between V and I then it is wrong because maximum possible it is only

90 degrees-positive or negative. Conventionally, if the current lags the voltage -inductive load-then the angle

positive and if it is capacitive it is negative. In any case cosines is positive but sinus could be positive or negative

So P has to be positive always. Q may be negative.

It seems to me it is not the right voltage [it is not the same phase as the current].
 
The load could be:

pure resistive cosfi=1 sinfi=0 fi=0 degrees

pure inductive: cosfi=0 sinfi=1 fi=+90 degrees

pure capacitive cosfi=0 sinfi=-1 fi=-90 degrees

If it would be mixed load then the angle could be more than -90 and less than +90
 
It depends on the reference direction you chose.If you considered a load,and the reference direction of current is entering towards positive reference terminal of load voltage you will not get an angle more than 90 degree, and the active power(absorbed) is always positive.However for a power source,angle more than 90 is possible and you will get negative active power in that case.This means source is supplying power.

So if your example refers to a load, you chose the current reference direction away from positive reference direction of load voltage and hence negative active power.Because in this case VICos(phi) referes to active power supplied, which is negative for a load.
If your example is of a power source, it possible for the source to absorb or provide active power.In that case it depends on how you chose current direction.If you chose current direction away from positive terminal and still you got negative active power, it means source is absorbing power.
I
 
If it is about a generator and V it is the output voltage, I agree with it. According to the sign convention the active power P is negative-if the generator supply the power, as usual. Of course, in a fault case, the generator turns into a motor and the power-maintaining the same sign rule-could be positive.
However, in my opinion, the angle between I and V cannot be more than 90 degrees-or less than -90.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K