Applied Physics & Math: Achieving Research Goals w/out Teaching

  • Thread starter Thread starter guss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the desire to major in Applied Physics, potentially double majoring with math, while expressing a clear preference for research over teaching. The individual is concerned about the possibility of ending up in a teaching role, despite acknowledging the value of educators. They seek guidance on how to avoid this path and whether Applied Physics aligns with their interests in theory and practical application.Responses highlight that an Applied Physics degree differs from an engineering degree, particularly in the job market, where engineering graduates may find it easier to secure positions without needing to market their skills as heavily. Some participants suggest that if the goal is immediate employment after a bachelor's degree, engineering might be a more practical choice. However, if the individual aims for graduate studies, Applied Physics could provide a suitable balance of theory and application. The conversation emphasizes the importance of aligning educational choices with career aspirations, particularly in research-oriented fields.
guss
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
I want to major in Applied Physics in college, and maybe double major with math. I will probably go on to get a Masters or PhD in Physics or Applied Physics.

My problem is this: I don't want to be a physics professor or teacher. I have heard lots of stories of people wanting to do other things in a certain field, only to end up as a physics teacher.

No offense to physics teachers, though. I just personally don't really like, and suck at, explaining things to people. I can absolutely see why people want to become teachers and respect them for that, personally, though, I would just prefer to do research.

This may be kind of a bad question, but what is the best way to make sure I don't end up as a teacher or professor? I would much prefer doing research somewhere. I have read ZapperZ guide.

I'm just curious if there's anything specific I should do, or anything specific I should avoid.

Thanks! And please don't take offense, teachers. :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered studying engineering?
 
Don't apply for teaching jobs then.
 
lisab said:
Have you considered studying engineering?
Kind of, but what I would enjoy doing the most is theorizing some method of doing something, then making it come to life. I would rather study physics than engineering because I like theory, but I also like doing a little engineering. I suppose I'm thinking that applied physics is kind of like a physics major and a mechanical (or whatever) engineering minor tied together. Am I thinking right? I kind of just threw applied physics out there because I wasn't quite sure what I wanted to do yet.

odinsthunder said:
Don't apply for teaching jobs then.
I'm just worried that that could become my only option.
 
Bump.
 
guss said:
Kind of, but what I would enjoy doing the most is theorizing some method of doing something, then making it come to life. I would rather study physics than engineering because I like theory, but I also like doing a little engineering. I suppose I'm thinking that applied physics is kind of like a physics major and a mechanical (or whatever) engineering minor tied together. Am I thinking right? I kind of just threw applied physics out there because I wasn't quite sure what I wanted to do yet.


I'm just worried that that could become my only option.

My $0.02: no, an applied physics degree wouldn't be the same as an engineering degree -- to a hiring manager. That's who you need to convince otherwise, and that can be tough.

What you describe - theorizing a solution and making it work - that's done all the time by engineers.

Full disclosure: my background is in physics and in general, I've had a harder time getting a job than engineers. Engineers don't have to convince anyone of their skills, they don't have to market themselves as hard as those with a physics degree, IMO. So when people write in that they are on the fence between the two, I usually nudge towards engineering.
 
lisab said:
My $0.02: no, an applied physics degree wouldn't be the same as an engineering degree -- to a hiring manager. That's who you need to convince otherwise, and that can be tough.

What you describe - theorizing a solution and making it work - that's done all the time by engineers.

Full disclosure: my background is in physics and in general, I've had a harder time getting a job than engineers. Engineers don't have to convince anyone of their skills, they don't have to market themselves as hard as those with a physics degree, IMO. So when people write in that they are on the fence between the two, I usually nudge towards engineering.
Really? I would rather derive an equation, or discover something new, and then put it to work, or possibly do research. That's not what I usually imagine engineers doing, but I could be wrong though. So you still think I should go engineer?
 
guss said:
Really? I would rather derive an equation, or discover something new, and then put it to work, or possibly do research. That's not what I usually imagine engineers doing, but I could be wrong though. So you still think I should go engineer?

If you only want to get a job afters bachelors than do engineering, if you want to go on to graduate school applied physics is a good mix of theory and application.
 
Back
Top