MHB Applying the annuity method - how?

  • Thread starter Thread starter indigo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annuity Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the feasibility of expanding a food processing company's production facilities using the annuity method. Key financial figures include an initial outlay of €800,000, a further €600,000 investment in four years, and annual net returns of €220,000 over ten years, with a desired return rate of 13%. Participants clarify that both the annuity method and present value calculations can be utilized, emphasizing the importance of consistency in approach. The annuity method is suggested for calculating the present value of future cash flows, while also noting that the depreciation of the asset may not be critical for this analysis. Ultimately, the focus is on accurately assessing the cash flows to determine if the expansion is financially viable.
indigo2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was given following task:

A food processing company has to make a decision whether or not to expand its production facilities. A feasibility study showed the following estimates:

Initial cost outlay €800,000
Further outlay in 4 years €600,000
Residual value after 10 years €200,000
Net returns at the end of each year for 10 years €220,000

Indicate whether the expansion should be undertaken if the desired rate of return on investment is 13%. Apply the annuity method!

I do not know how to use the annuity method to this task, I thought this would be solved with present value method, or can both be done? What is the right formula to use the annuity method here?

I am happy about any hint how to solve it! :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
indigo said:
Hello,

I was given following task:

A food processing company has to make a decision whether or not to expand its production facilities. A feasibility study showed the following estimates:

Initial cost outlay €800,000
Further outlay in 4 years €600,000
Residual value after 10 years €200,000
Net returns at the end of each year for 10 years €220,000

Indicate whether the expansion should be undertaken if the desired rate of return on investment is 13%. Apply the annuity method!

I do not know how to use the annuity method to this task, I thought this would be solved with present value method, or can both be done? What is the right formula to use the annuity method here?

I am happy about any hint how to solve it! :)
Annuity Method? Does that mean something other than the consideration of the time value of money?

If v = 1 / 1.13, we have, simply:

Cost = 800000 + 600000v^4 - 200000v^10 - 220000(v + v^2 + v^3 + ... + v^10)

If you like, you can add up the last part, $220000\cdot\dfrac{v - v^{11}}{1-v}$

Seriously, just draw a time diagramme and put your cash flows on it. Is that the "Annuity Method"?

The "Annuity Method" may be a way to depreciate your initial asset, but since we are not valuing anything at any intermediate date, I'm not real clear on why we care how it depreciates. We just need to know where it ends up - which is given.
 
Outlay portion:
-800000(1.13)^10 - 600000(1.13)^6 + 200000

Revenue portion:
annual annuity of 220000: n=10, i=.13

Agree TK?
 
Wilmer said:
Outlay portion:
-800000(1.13)^10 - 600000(1.13)^6 + 200000

Revenue portion:
annual annuity of 220000: n=10, i=.13

Agree TK?

Whether you accumulate or discount, it is of no consequence. The conclusion is the same.

Whether payouts are positive or negative, and income is negative or positive, it is of no consequence. The conclusion is the same.

Just be consistent. Make up your mind what you are doing before you start writing and don't change the rules mid problem.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top