1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Applying the Mean Value Theorem to sequences of function

  1. Jan 18, 2012 #1
    As usual, I typed up the problem and my attempt in LaTeX:


    Maybe I'm not applying the MVT correctly, but my result does not seem to help me solve the problem in anyway. What are your thoughts?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 18, 2012 #2
    Maybe you shouldn't apply the mean value theorem on [a,b] but rather on [x,x0]??
  4. Jan 19, 2012 #3
    Thanks, that would help. Ok I tried your suggestion and here is the result. The problem is now making use of the [itex]f'_n(c) - f'_m(c)[/itex] since they do not appear in the triangle inequality. And also, I am not using the assumption that [itex]f'_n[/itex] converges uniformly.

  5. Jan 19, 2012 #4
    In your triangle inequality, you have a term


    Isn't this the same as the numerator of what you got after applying the mean value theorem??
  6. Jan 20, 2012 #5
    Well, no, it's slightly different:

    [tex]|f_n(x) + f_m(x) - f_n(x_0) - f_m(x_0)|[/tex]

    We need it to be [tex]f_n(x) - f_m(x)[/tex] instead of +

    Oh btw, I noticed in your profile that it says you are 15. Is that true? Because that's incredible that you know so much math at that age, really astonishing.
  7. Jan 20, 2012 #6
    Oh, how did you get that + in the mean value theorem? That isn't correct. The mean value theorem says that


    You seemed to have applied the mean-value theorem to [itex]f_n+f_m[/itex]...
  8. Jan 22, 2012 #7
    Micromass, I believe I have found the solution! Here is my completed proof, what do you think?

  9. Jan 22, 2012 #8
    Hmm, you know that that c is depend on n and m right?? You act like there is only one c, but there are multiple c's.

    And to be sure you really get it: where exactly do you need uniform convergence of [itex](f^\prime_n)_n[/itex]??
  10. Jan 22, 2012 #9
    Oh, well it was my understanding that the c was only dependent on the [tex][x, x_0][/tex]. I guess I didn't understand that c could be different for different m's and n's.

    We need uniform convergence of [itex](f^\prime_n)_n[/itex] because we have to use the Cauchy Criterion for Uniform Convergence.

    Well, since my proof is incorrect then, could you point me in the right direction so that I can try to complete this?
  11. Jan 22, 2012 #10
    The mean value theorem on a function actually implies:

    [tex]|g(a)-g(b)|\leq |a-b| \sup_{c\in [a,b]}|g^\prime(c)|[/tex]

    I suggest you use this. It will become apparent where the uniform convergence is used.
  12. Jan 22, 2012 #11
    I guess I'm not quite sure I understand. My book has no mention of this variation to the MVT. Are you certain that it is necessary to solve this problem?
  13. Jan 22, 2012 #12
    It's quite easy to prove from the MVT.

    I think it's the easiest and cleanest way...
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook