Approximating Integral w/ Singularity at x=0 Using Trapezoidal Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter sara_87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numerical
Click For Summary
The integral \(\int^{1}_{0}\frac{1}{x}dx\) presents a challenge due to the singularity at \(x=0\), leading to an undefined result of +infinity. The trapezoidal rule cannot be directly applied because of this singularity, making it necessary to find alternative approaches. One suggested method is to exclude a small interval around the singularity and apply the trapezoidal rule to the remaining portion of the integral. This would provide an estimate, albeit an imperfect one. Numerical integration of functions with singularities typically requires more complex techniques.
sara_87
Messages
748
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to approximate the following integral:

\int^{1}_{0}\frac{1}{x}dx

using the trapezoidal quadrature rule.
However there is a singularity at x=0.

Homework Equations



trapezoidal method:

\int^{a}_{b}f(x) dx \approx \frac{h}{2}(f(x_0))+h\sum_{i=1}^{n}(f(x_i))+\frac{h}{2}(f(x_n))

where x_i = i*h and h=1/n and i = 0,1,2,...,n

The Attempt at a Solution



\int^{a}_{b}f(x)dx \approx \frac{h}{2}(1/x_0)+h\sum_{i=1}^{n}(1/x_i)+\frac{h}{2}(1/x_n)

i can implement the second and last term but not the first term due to the singularity (at x=0)
How can i deal with the singularity?
any help or ideas will be very much appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's worse than just the function having a singularity. The singularity is bad enough that the integral doesn't exist. In some sense, the answer to the integral is +infinity. There is an infinite amount of area under the curve. How can you (or why would you want to) approximate that?
 
thank you.
But, If i was to use the trapezoidal method in this case, or in any other case where i have a singularity in the function at the end point, how would i get rid of the singularity?
 
sara_87 said:
thank you.
But, If i was to use the trapezoidal method in this case, or in any other case where i have a singularity in the function at the end point, how would i get rid of the singularity?

There's no way to 'get rid of it'. I think numerical methods for integrating functions with singularities are complicated. You could always make a small interval around the singularity and throw it away and apply the trapezoid method to the rest. It would be an estimate anyway.
 
thank you :)
i will consider this.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K