Approximating Magnetic Field for Spinning Disk with Large Distance from Center

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a magnetic field equation for a spinning disk, specifically focusing on the approximation of the magnetic field B when the distance x is much greater than the radius R of the disk. The original poster presents a formula involving the magnetic dipole moment and seeks to understand how it simplifies under certain conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of terms in the equation, particularly the treatment of R^2 as a small quantity. There is mention of using the Binomial Series for approximations, and questions arise about the application of this series and subsequent steps in the simplification process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different mathematical approaches and clarifying concepts related to series expansions. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the Binomial Series, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster is grappling with the mathematical concepts involved, particularly in relation to the assumptions made about the sizes of R and x. The discussion reflects a learning environment where foundational understanding is being sought.

hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I am asked to show that

B = \frac{\mu_0Q\omega}{2\pi R^2}[\frac{R^2+2x^2}{(R^2+x^2)^{1/2}}-2x]

simplifies to this

B \approx \frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{x^3}

if x>>R

where \mu is the magnetic dipole moment for a disk spinning with angular velocity \omega, which is

\mu = \frac{Q\omega R^2}{4}

Homework Equations


GYza5r.png
[/B]


3. The Attempt at a Solution


I ignored the R^2 in the denominator since it has become a small quantity. Then I have (R^2+2x^2)/(sqrt(x^2)) -2x
From this I get R^2/x but this equation lacks the third degree of the x.
The book has a solution for this problem as I have posted but I didn't understand it either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hitemup said:
I ignored the R^2 in the denominator since it has become a small quantity.
Small, but not irrelevant - you subtract two "large" numbers with a small difference from each other, so the first order of the difference is relevant. See the second line in (2), where the (inverse) denominator gets expanded up to second order (the part with "...").
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hitemup
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hitemup
NascentOxygen said:
It looks like they are using the first few terms of the Binomial Series to approximate (a + x)

Have you come across the binomial series in your maths study? See the bottom half of this page: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/BinomialSeries.aspx
I learned it in high school and it was only for integers. This is something new but I'll try to handle it, thank you. What exactly has to be done after writing the series expansion?
 
Last edited:
You substitute the first few terms of the infinite series (writing it in the numerator) in place of the square-root expression in the denominator, then multiply and simplify.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hitemup

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
824
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
923
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K