Are anyons possible in higher dimensions?

haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
Weinberg wrote that in 3D and higher spaces all particles must be bosons or fermions. The proof used the fact that particles are really indistinguishable i.e. we can't "mark" any particle and the mathematical replacement of two particles of the same type should not change any physical observable.

Yet in 2D space there anyons are possible. The particles' trajectories can nontrivially wrap over themselves and thus they are distinguishable. A particle spacetime history is its "mark". This is possible only in 2D space, since in higher dimensions all trajectories are topologically equivalent.

Now what if 3D space had some nontrivial topology? I.e. there is a wormhole or there is some elementary string or loop that particles can wrap around. This would give us the necessary topological mark so the proof does not pass.

Does anyone know if anyons can exist in higher-dimensional spaces with nontrivial topology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top