Are double bonds/resonance structures more nucleophilic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the nucleophilicity of carbon-carbon double and triple bonds. It concludes that while double bonds can act as nucleophiles, their nucleophilicity is context-dependent, particularly influenced by the presence of strong electrophiles. The discussion also highlights that double bonds can exhibit electrophilic characteristics when interacting with strong nucleophiles, especially when substituents like nitro groups are present. Additionally, the role of resonance structures in benzene rings is acknowledged, emphasizing the complexity of nucleophilic behavior in organic compounds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nucleophiles and electrophiles in organic chemistry
  • Familiarity with carbon-carbon double and triple bonds
  • Knowledge of resonance structures, particularly in benzene rings
  • Basic concepts of electrophilic addition reactions, such as those in Friedel-Crafts conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of nucleophilic addition reactions involving carbon-carbon double bonds
  • Study the effects of substituents on the nucleophilicity and electrophilicity of double bonds
  • Explore the role of resonance in determining the reactivity of aromatic compounds
  • Learn about the comparative nucleophilicity of carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in reaction mechanisms and the reactivity of organic compounds.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
I'm only talking about carbon-carbon double/triple bonds here.

A nucleophilic atom is one that would donate electrons to an electrophile (often a highly electronegative atom like oxygen or a halogen). Anyways, what about carbon-carbon double bonds? I'm inclined to think that they're less nucleophilic since their formal chage is reduced by the double bond (so there are fewer electrons to go around each carbon atom).

Does the same logic apply to resonance structures in benzene rings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simfish said:
I'm only talking about carbon-carbon double/triple bonds here.

A nucleophilic atom is one that would donate electrons to an electrophile (often a highly electronegative atom like oxygen or a halogen). Anyways, what about carbon-carbon double bonds? I'm inclined to think that they're less nucleophilic since their formal chage is reduced by the double bond (so there are fewer electrons to go around each carbon atom).

Does the same logic apply to resonance structures in benzene rings?

More nucleophilic than what? Double bonds do donate their electrons in reactions so in that sense they are nucleophilic. They tend to do it to strong acids, specifically the proton. Usually the first step addition with HX. With benzene structures, strong acids like you would find in Friedel-Crafts conditions can be thought of in this way.

Triple bonds are a special case.
 
Are they more nucleophilic than carbon-carbon single bonds?

Oh okay I see. Could double bonds also be electrophilic? (with respect to strong nucleophiles?)
 
It's hard to give a definitive answer to this because it depends on a lot of things, e.g. what double bond/triple bond is reacting with and what its substituents are. With a strong enough electrophile, a double bond will be nucleophilic. Similarly, with a strong enough nucleophile, a double bond will be electrophilic.

In general though, double bonds that have an electrophilic substituent, e.g. something like C=C-NO2, will be electrophilic at the beta carbon, and something CH3S- can add to the double bond.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K