Are Electromagnetic Waves the Key to Wireless Energy Transmission?

[_F_]

Hi all,

Can someone please elaborate on some of the following ideas so that I can get these down correctly?

1. is an electromagnetic wave a form of a self-perpetual motion machine?

2. since electric and magnetic fields contain energy, is this the hope that people (Tesla!) have for wireless energy transmission?

Thank you.

 

[olgranpappy]

Hi all,

Can someone please elaborate on some of the following ideas so that I can get these down correctly?

1. is an electromagnetic wave a form of a self-perpetual motion machine?

no.

2. since electric and magnetic fields contain energy, is this the hope that people (Tesla!) have for wireless energy transmission?

i don't know.

Thank you.

 

[_F_]

no.

why not?

i don't know.

okay.


Thank you.

 

[Dale]

why not?

Obviously because a perpetual motion machine violates the conservation of energy.

Don't follow this line of conversation any more, discussion of such crackpot theories is useless and is prohibited by the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=5374".

 

[jtbell]

1. is an electromagnetic wave a form of a self-perpetual motion machine?

A "perpetual motion machine" usually means a device that can supply energy indefinitely without an external energy source. You can certainly extract energy from an electromagnetic wave, but you have to have an energy source in order to produce the wave in the first place. And when you extract energy from the wave, you absorb the wave, so if you want the process to continue, you have to generate new waves.

 

[_F_]

I'm not trying to argue that you can use electromagnetic waves to harness any type of perpetual motion. I was just asking if an elecromagnetic wave is a type (maybe "type" is the wrong word here?) of perpetual motion?

Or maybe I'm mistaken. Do electromagnetic waves die out over some distance?

In space there is no friction, so anything with any initial velocity would go on forever and that's not really the type of perpetual motion I'm talking about. But in air or some other medium where there is friction,... perhaps electromagnetic waves die out? if not, why not?

 

[Hootenanny]

I'm not trying to argue that you can use electromagnetic waves to harness any type of perpetual motion. I was just asking if an elecromagnetic wave is a type (maybe "type" is the wrong word here?) of perpetual motion?

Or maybe I'm mistaken. Do electromagnetic waves die out over some distance?

In space there is no friction, so anything with any initial velocity would go on forever and that's not really the type of perpetual motion I'm talking about. But in air or some other medium where there is friction,... perhaps electromagnetic waves die out? if not, why not?

Indeed, in dielectric media electromagnetic waves are attenuated and so do "die out".

 

[olgranpappy]

I'm not trying to argue that you can use electromagnetic waves to harness any type of perpetual motion. I was just asking if an elecromagnetic wave is a type (maybe "type" is the wrong word here?) of perpetual motion?

No, it is not. Maybe you are thinking that because the electric field induces the magnetic field that this back and forth motion is "perpetual". However, any undamped (and thus highly idealized) classical motion appears "perpetual" in this sense. Consider, for example, a steel marble rolling back and forth in the bottom of a glass bowl. Without damping there is no reason why the marble should ever stop rolling back and forth. But so what? This marble and bowl system is no more a perpetual motion machine than your wave of light.

 

[Mårten]

Really interesting. We were just discussing this here, when looking at Maxwell 3 and Maxwell 4, and how the fields are inducing each other back and forth, in a sort of (but maybe not really) perpetual way. Still, I can't see that "_F_" had his question answered, "Do electromagnetic waves die out over some distance". Think of this:

1) EM waves are emitted from a source, traveling through vacuum. Do they ever die out? Do they faint with distance? If so, what damps the wave? Where in Maxwell's equations can I see this damping effect?

2) Concentrating on the electric field here. It will according to Coulomb's law decrease with distance squared. But is the inducing back-and-forth-mechanism counteracting this decreasing?

Like _F_ I'm also eager to know!

 

[jtbell]

1) EM waves are emitted from a source, traveling through vacuum. Do they ever die out? Do they faint with distance? If so, what damps the wave? Where in Maxwell's equations can I see this damping effect?

When you get far enough away from the source, the amplitude of the wave decreases as 1/r, if there is nothing to absorb it. The irradiance of the wave (power per unit area) is proportional to the square of the amplitude, so it decreases as 1/r^2. This is what one expects from energy conservation: the area of a sphere centered on the source increases as r^2, so the total energy that passes through successive concentric spheres remains constant.

You don't see this directly in Maxwell's equations, but rather in their solution for e.g. the [oscillating] Hertzian dipole. Equations 1090 and 1091 at the link show the E and B fields in the "far field" of such a dipole.

2) Concentrating on the electric field here. It will according to Coulomb's law decrease with distance squared. But is the inducing back-and-forth-mechanism counteracting this decreasing?

You could say that, yes. The average E for the oscillating dipole decreases as 1/r instead of 1/r^2, that is, less rapidly.

 

[Redbelly98]

2. since electric and magnetic fields contain energy, is this the hope that people (Tesla!) have for wireless energy transmission?

I would say yes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...ransmission&aq=0&oq=wireless+energy+tran&aqi=

The irradiance of the wave (power per unit area) is proportional to the square of the amplitude, so it decreases as 1/r^2

Agreed.