Are frequency and energy related?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter **Mariam**
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Frequency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between frequency and energy in the context of waves, particularly comparing simple harmonic motion (SHM) and electromagnetic (EM) waves. Participants explore how amplitude, frequency, and energy interact in these different phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that in SHM, the period and frequency do not depend on amplitude, while energy is proportional to amplitude.
  • Another participant states that the energy of EM waves is proportional to their frequency and that energy transmitted by EM waves is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the fields.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that amplitude corresponds to the number of photons arriving per second, with high-frequency EM waves having high-energy photons and low-frequency waves having lower energy photons.
  • One participant emphasizes that SHM and EM waves are fundamentally different, with the energy of EM waves being dependent solely on frequency, referencing Planck's findings.
  • Another participant challenges the assertion that energy in SHM is not related to amplitude, stating that it is actually proportional to the square of the amplitude.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between amplitude, frequency, and energy, particularly contrasting SHM with EM waves. There is no consensus on the implications of these relationships, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationship between frequency, amplitude, and energy, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and different types of waves. There are unresolved points regarding the definitions and implications of these relationships.

**Mariam**
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hello, I am studying about waves and simple harmonic motion.
I have a confusion; when we studied the formula for period of pendulum and spring (T=2pi(rad(m/k))), it can be deduced that period doesn't depend on amplitude and so does frequency (T=1/f)
Then we learned about how amplitude and energy are proportional.

But then recently I was reading about electromagnetic waves and it said that "the energy transmitted by the waves is in direct proportion to their frequencies."

So how is frequency and energy related if frequency and amplitude are not??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy of the quanta of EM waves is proportional to frequency. Those quanta of energy are the photons.

For EM-waves, energy transmitted is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the fields.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: **Mariam**
**Mariam** said:
So how is frequency and energy related if frequency and amplitude are not??
One way to think of it is that Amplitude (or at least Power transferred) corresponds to the number of photons arriving per second. High frequency EM has high energy photons (it comes in big dollops of energy) and low frequency EM comes in small dollops. So the same power of EM wave involves fewer photons at high frequency than the number at low frequency.
Your confusion is quite reasonable here because there is the Quantum issue to be considered, with EM. The Energy of a photon is very relevant when individual photons are interacting (say in a photographic process, photosynthesis or in photovoltaic cells) but, when something is just getting heated up by EM radiation, its the total power flux that counts. There is, in fact, no contradiction in the statements you are quoting.
 
zabini said:
In fact electromagnetic waves need not be sinusoidal at all.
Neither do any other waves - e.g. sound (Shouts loudly and very non-sinusoidally!)
 
zabini said:
Shm and electromagnetic waves are two different phenomenon. In case of shm you are absolutely correct in saying that it is directly proportional to amplitude. Electromagnetic waves are generated due to a moving charge or photon. The energy emitted by them is purely dependent upon frequency and is in no way related to shm. Plank experimentally found out this result which we today know as the Plank's equation. In fact electromagnetic waves need not be sinusoidal at all.
Zabini, this is wrong. Two obvious points:
  • The energy of simple harmonic motion of a mass-spring system is proportional to the square of the amplitude
  • Planck was a theorist
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
682
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
24K