Are landfills the best solution for rubbish

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of landfills as a waste management solution, highlighting the need for a value-based evaluation of waste management strategies. Participants argue that a free market approach is essential for determining the best methods for waste disposal, including recycling and incineration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of property rights in managing landfill operations and the potential negative environmental impacts of recycling practices. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that reducing waste generation is the most effective strategy for addressing rubbish disposal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free market principles in waste management
  • Knowledge of property rights and their implications for landfill operations
  • Familiarity with recycling processes and their environmental impact
  • Awareness of waste reduction strategies and regulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of free market waste management
  • Examine case studies on property rights and landfill operations
  • Investigate the environmental effects of various recycling practices
  • Explore effective waste reduction strategies and policies
USEFUL FOR

Environmental policymakers, waste management professionals, and individuals interested in sustainable practices will benefit from this discussion.

  • #121
Evo said:
You've lost me here. Government policies to work for free where? At your place of work?
Policies such as forcing people to sort their own garbage rather than having a company do it. Another example is forced community service as a form of punishment. Another is the use of prison labor to manufacture stuff. So prisoners manufacture the garbage, people sort it for free, then those guilty of minor crimes clean up the recycling center. Honest citizens have to compete with this free labor.

But at least it's not racially motivated slavery. (I'm not claiming it is racially unbiased though.)

I think the Green movement tends to be run by upper middle class people with little understanding of the costs they incur with simple plans built on their justified outrage. But perhaps I'm wrong? Does anyone have data?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #122
Jeff Rosenbury said:
Policies such as forcing people to sort their own garbage rather than having a company do it.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Here in San Diego, everyone is supplied with a recycling bin along with their trash bin, but actually using the recycling bin is completely optional.

Is it mandatory to recycle where you live?
 
  • #123
Russ, it's easier to look at uber-rich than rich. Further they have more input on social decisions than the rich, at least individually (though probably not as a group). Tracking the rich is harder.

Would you accept a list of the richest counties? These can be compared to a map of deaths per state from coal. I would note that the large plant near D.C. (and all those rich counties) is actually a gas fired plant though it still retains its coal capability for emergencies. Meanwhile Californians are dying to air pollution other than direct coal burning.

Looking at the map in your link, there is a lot of risk in the East. Excepting a few counties around Washington and other large cities the mortality effects are much higher. Examining the list of rich counties, it seems to match the counties with low risk of mortality. Still, not all rich people live in rich counties.

But let me be clear, I'm not arguing against burning coal. There are costs to not burning coal such as not having power for hospitals and the like. Nor am I arguing against rich people. I believe some people provide more value to society than others and deserve more money. But I also believe that everyone is of some value, and we shouldn't ignore people just because they work lower paying jobs in poor areas. A fast food employee serves her fellow humans as much as Donald Trump, even if Trump has a larger economic impact.

We should promote economic policies which help everyone, not just rich people. Giving free labor to rich people seems churlish to me.
 
  • #124
zoobyshoe said:
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Here in San Diego, everyone is supplied with a recycling bin along with their trash bin, but actually using the recycling bin is completely optional.

Is it mandatory to recycle where you live?
No, but I've lived places where it is.
 
  • #125
Jeff Rosenbury said:
No, but I've lived places where it is.
I just checked and, ironically, San Diego does, allegedly, have mandatory recycling. I say "allegedly" because I have never seen, or heard of it, being enforced.
 
  • #126
In the UK we have three bins one for rubbish one for garden waste and one for recycling, i think the bins are not checked for proper usage. it is up to the user, but obviously if the collectors saw a branch sticking out of the recycle bin they would say some thing.
 
  • #127
wolram said:
In the UK we have three bins one for rubbish one for garden waste and one for recycling, i think the bins are not checked for proper usage. it is up to the user, but obviously if the collectors saw a branch sticking out of the recycle bin they would say some thing.
I've heard stories from the U.K. It seems the local authorities vary quite a bit in trash rules and enforcement. The stories I've heard were of authoritarian excess, but they probably were the worst of the worst.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
10K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
893
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K