Are Manned Missions Still Necessary for Space Exploration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xecute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Safety
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of manned missions versus robotic exploration in space. While machines are cheaper and can operate longer than humans, both have faced failures. Future missions may involve humans in modified bodies or non-biological machines that replicate human consciousness. There is speculation that future exploration could rely on nanomachinery and software instead of traditional biological entities. The conversation suggests a shift towards advanced technology in space exploration, potentially diminishing the role of manned missions.
xecute
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
should we keep sending machines to other planets to discover, or .. should we send men? after all, machines have been failing
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
So have manned missions. Machines are much cheaper and able to continue to send information long after their biological equivalents would have expired.
 
xecute said:
should we keep sending machines to other planets to discover, or .. should we send men? after all, machines have been failing


quite soon these will be the same thing-

future "manned" misions will be humans in adapted bodies/tools- either heavily modified biological bodies or non-biological machines running a copy of human mind-ware- or at least remotely linked directly to the motor/sensory inputs/outputs of a human brain somewhere on earth-

eventually we should only be sending small packages of nanomachinery and software into space- at some point- nanomachinery and software may be all most of us are here on Earth as well!
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top