Are photon energies constant for any observers?

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
Title should be: Are photon energies constant along null geodesics? [Mentor's note: Title corrected]

As I understand it in general relativity the paths of light rays, given by null geodesics, are scale invariant.

Is that correct?

Now Maxwell's equations in flat Minkowski spacetime are also scale invariant.

General curved spacetime is locally flat in the vicinity of any point along a trajectory in spacetime.

Do these facts imply that the energy/momentum of photons is actually constant along the trajectory of the light beam?

Observers themselves and their measuring equipment do have fixed length scales so that their energies are not scale invariant. The energies of the emitting and absorbing atoms change but the energy of the photon itself is constant. This would be an explanation of the gravitational redshift effect without the assumption of changing photon energy.

To summarise: the scale of a photon is set purely by the emitting atom - after emission neither Maxwell's laws nor general relativity change the photon's scale.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
However observers modiffract different speeds relative to one another will measure different energies for the photon as they measure different frequencies. This is just the Doppler effect at work.
 
Nugatory said:
However observers modiffract different speeds relative to one another will measure different energies for the photon as they measure different frequencies. This is just the Doppler effect at work.

What happens if the emitter and the absorber are both locally in free-fall frames?

Would there be no Doppler effect in this case - just a difference in energy due to the different clock rates at emitter and absorber?
 
jcap said:
What happens if the emitter and the absorber are both locally in free-fall frames?

Would there be no Doppler effect in this case - just a difference in energy due to the different clock rates at emitter and absorber?

There is still Doppler if there is relative motion.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
990
Replies
1
Views
940
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
908
Replies
58
Views
3K
Back
Top