Are Quantum Energy and Gravity the Same Phenomenon?

sirchick
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hey

I been reading about an experiment that took place involving two metals plates in a vacuum, of which they are drawn together by quantum energy pressure differences between the plates and behind the plates.

But this made me wonder, if this draws them together, is this not similar to gravity with two objects in space being drawn together? How do they know for sure that its not the same thing?

I should mention I am self teaching myself so i end up some times getting confused :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are referring to is called the Casimir Effect. As to whether one can confuse it with gravity keep in mind that our theory(ies) of gravity don't simply tell us qualitatively that "two massive things are attracted" but tell us by how much and how this force of attraction changes with the mass of the plates and their separation. The same is true of the Casimir force (off the top of my head I believe the Casimir force falls of with the inverse 4th power of the separation). So if you were to do an experiment to verify the existence of the Casimir force you wouldn't simple put two plates close together and see "if there an attraction at all", you would instead see how this force varies with separation (and possibly material) and make sure the data matched the appropriate equation. Remember, physics is QUANTITATIVE.
 
sirchick said:
But this made me wonder, if this draws them together, is this not similar to gravity with two objects in space being drawn together? How do they know for sure that its not the same thing?

Opposite ends of magnets attract too. That doesn't make that force the same as gravity either.

To add to what Many_S_Theory said: gravity falls by the inverse 2nd power of separation. Also, gravity has other important characteristics (such as time dilation) not shared by the Casimir effect.
 
In experiments on the Casimir force, the gravitational attractions experienced by the these very small mirrors is very small, orders of magnitude too small to account for the attraction.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top