Are R^2 and R^n Homeomorphic If n is Not Equal to 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gop
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 3K views
gop
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that [tex]R^2[/tex] and [tex]R^n[/tex] are not homeomorphic if [tex]n\neq2[/tex] (Hint: Consider the complement of a point in [tex]R^2[/tex] or [tex]R^n[/tex]).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




The proof that [tex]R^n[/tex] is not homeomorphic to [tex]R[/tex] is done by considering that if they are homeomorphic i.e. there exists a continuous bijection with continuous inverse [tex]f:R\rightarrow R^n[/tex]. Then the restriction [tex]f:R\backslash {0} \rightarrow R^n\backslash f(0)[/tex] is also a continuous bijection. Since [tex]R\backslash {0}[/tex] is not connected but [tex]R^n\backslash f(0)[/tex] is if [tex]n\neq 1[/tex] we have a contradiction.

However, to show that [tex]R^2[/tex] is not homeomorphic to [tex]R^n[/tex] this doesn't work. There is also no other topological invariant I could detect. Both [tex]R^2[/tex] and [tex]R^n[/tex] are contractible to a point and thus have the same fundamental group, for example.

I would appreciate any idea
thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Instead of taking out a point, try taking out something bigger :)
 
gop said:

Homework Statement



Prove that [tex]R^2[/tex] and [tex]R^n[/tex] are not homeomorphic if [tex]n\neq2[/tex] (Hint: Consider the complement of a point in [tex]R^2[/tex] or [tex]R^n[/tex]).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




The proof that [tex]R^n[/tex] is not homeomorphic to [tex]R[/tex] is done by considering that if they are homeomorphic i.e. there exists a continuous bijection with continuous inverse [tex]f:R\rightarrow R^n[/tex]. Then the restriction [tex]f:R\backslash {0} \rightarrow R^n\backslash f(0)[/tex] is also a continuous bijection. Since [tex]R\backslash {0}[/tex] is not connected but [tex]R^n\backslash f(0)[/tex] is if [tex]n\neq 1[/tex] we have a contradiction.

However, to show that [tex]R^2[/tex] is not homeomorphic to [tex]R^n[/tex] this doesn't work. There is also no other topological invariant I could detect. Both [tex]R^2[/tex] and [tex]R^n[/tex] are contractible to a point and thus have the same fundamental group, for example.

I would appreciate any idea
thx
You can continue that idea. In R2\{0}, a closed loop containing a point p cannot be contracted to a point. In Rn, for n larger than 2, it can.