I Are Reynolds Vortices a Real Scientific Phenomenon?

AI Thread Summary
Reynolds Vortices, as mentioned in a recent fictional book, appear to be a concept created by the author rather than an established phenomenon in fluid mechanics. The discussion highlights that while the term "Reynolds" is associated with fluid dynamics, particularly the Reynolds number, the specific vortices described do not have a basis in scientific literature. Participants noted that authors often invent scientific terms for narrative purposes, enhancing the story's thematic elements. The author of the book confirmed that these vortices were fictional constructs needed for the plot. Overall, the conversation reflects on the intersection of literature and science, emphasizing creativity in storytelling.
stockzahn
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
498
Reaction score
137
Dear all,

recently I read in a belletristic book about Reynolds Vortices. In the fictitious story the author writes about special (Reynolds) vortices generated in the whitewater, which can be passed in only one direction by objects of a "critical" density, which then will be kept in the vortex as long as it exists. Objects with densities deviating from this density can leave it (again).

I've never heard about this phenomenon until then and also after a quick search in the internet I couldn't find any information about these vortices. Does anybody know about these Reynolds vortices (maybe there is a different name) or is it just made up by the author in his story?

Thanks in advance,
stockzahn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can honestly say I've never heard of the concept over the course of my adventures in fluid mechanics. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it's certainly not a very well-known phenomenon if it does.
 
  • Like
Likes stockzahn
Literature requires different analytical tools from technical documents. While not familiar with this author, "whitewater" invokes both beauty and dynamism typical to belle lettres stories. The reader (or characters, the post is limited) exist poised at the interface of water and atmosphere presumably at the surface.

Reynolds (number) is a convenient indicator of smooth, potentially guiding fluid flow, becoming turbulent "whitewater", thus a dimensionless symbol of movement, change. The vortices could refer to von Karman vortex streets that represent difficulties or obstructions that arise in the flow as the plot progresses. "Critical density" could refer to knowledge and reasoning overcoming perceived obstacles (vortices) to smooth flow. I'd need to read the book for further analysis.

Generally, writers like to borrow terms and names from physics then concatenate them for literary effect. Einstein intersection (Chip Delaney), Von Neumann machines (Arthur Clark), and now Reynolds vortex (uncited).
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for your responses. Since nobody seemed to know about Reynolds Vortices, I wrote an e-mail to the author of the book and he, quite surprisingly, promptly replied. He admitted that he made up this kind of vortices he "needed" for his story.

@Klystron: For sake of completeness of your list: Reynolds Vortex (Joerg Maurer).
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
stockzahn said:
Thank you very much for your responses. Since nobody seemed to know about Reynolds Vortices, I wrote an e-mail to the author of the book and he, quite surprisingly, promptly replied. He admitted that he made up this kind of vortices he "needed" for his story.
To get really known as a scientist, you need to have cool sci-fi stuff named after you, not just some number.
 
stockzahn said:
Thank you very much for your responses. Since nobody seemed to know about Reynolds Vortices, I wrote an e-mail to the author of the book and he, quite surprisingly, promptly replied. He admitted that he made up this kind of vortices he "needed" for his story.

@Klystron: For sake of completeness of your list: Reynolds Vortex (Joerg Maurer).

Thanks for the information. It seems as if the author succeeded as a writer in that you were motivated to ask the question. I chose von Karman vortices as an example in part because of the beauty in their representation on screen. Unlike the classical whirlpool representation "Scylla and Charybdis" from Homer's Odyssey, a vortex street appears in a fluid when physical conditions lead to that formation not only above rock formations as in the Straits of Messina.
upload_2019-1-11_12-8-44.jpeg
Johann_Heinrich_F%C3%BCssli_054.jpg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-11_12-8-44.jpeg
    upload_2019-1-11_12-8-44.jpeg
    9.1 KB · Views: 376
  • Johann_Heinrich_F%C3%BCssli_054.jpg
    Johann_Heinrich_F%C3%BCssli_054.jpg
    36.9 KB · Views: 387
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top