Are Stoic Quotes and Buddhist Philosophy Linked?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madness
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the similarities between Stoic philosophy and Buddhist teachings, particularly through quotes from Epictetus. Participants note that both philosophies emphasize the importance of managing desires and perceptions to achieve freedom and peace of mind. There is acknowledgment that these ideas may have emerged independently from different cultural backgrounds, with Stoicism rooted in ancient Greek thought and Buddhism in Vedic philosophy. The conversation also touches on historical influences, suggesting that while Stoic philosophers likely had no direct knowledge of Buddhism, the convergence of ideas across different traditions is not surprising. The dialogue highlights the recurring nature of certain philosophical concepts throughout history, as seen in other thinkers like Schopenhauer, who was influenced by both Eastern and Western philosophies. Overall, the thread reflects an exploration of how diverse philosophical systems can arrive at similar conclusions about human experience and existence.
madness
Messages
813
Reaction score
69
Does anyone else think these stoic quotes are remarkably similar to Buddhist philosophy?

"Freedom is secured not by the fulfilling of one's desires, but by the removal of desire." (iv.1.175) Epictetus

"Man is disturbed not by things, but by the views he takes of them." (Ench. 5) Epictetus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
madness said:
Does anyone else think these stoic quotes are remarkably similar to Buddhist philosophy?

"Freedom is secured not by the fulfilling of one's desires, but by the removal of desire." (iv.1.175) Epictetus

"Man is disturbed not by things, but by the views he takes of them." (Ench. 5) Epictetus

Wow, just wanted to acknowledge your thought provoking, interesting question. I have no real opinion based on my current knowledge, but perhaps I'll spend a day or two investigating it because it sounds like it would be fun!
 
Wisdom is not bound by the names we give it
 
Gwilim said:
Wisdom is not bound by the names we give it

Uh?

Afraid I don't get it...
 
swat4life said:
Uh?

Afraid I don't get it...

It is not that surprising that two gifted philosophers of the same species would arrive at similar conclusions when considering the same problems. The immediate experience of existence on its deepest and most fundamental level is something we all participate in.
 
Presumably these stoic philosophers had no knowledge of Buddhism and were not influenced by it? I know Schopenhauer had similar views on desire and the will, but he was quite heavily influenced by Buddhism and Indian religion such as the Upanishads.
 
With selective quoting, it can also be argued that the ancient Greeks had a surprisingly profound knowledge of modern science, such as the atomic theory of matter.
 
Moridin said:
With selective quoting, it can also be argued that the ancient Greeks had a surprisingly profound knowledge of modern science, such as the atomic theory of matter.

It wasn't 'knowledge' or 'science' because they didn't have experimental results to confirm their theories. Democritus did indeed come up with atomic theory, it's where our own word comes from.
 
madness said:
Presumably these stoic philosophers had no knowledge of Buddhism and were not influenced by it? I know Schopenhauer had similar views on desire and the will, but he was quite heavily influenced by Buddhism and Indian religion such as the Upanishads.

The Hellenic world was broadly speaking the area conquered by Alexander, which went as far east as the Indus river, so to rule the possibility out completely would be foolish, but as I have already mentioned, it is not really that surprising to see unrelated schools of thought promoting similar ideals.
 
  • #10
It may not be entirely surprising but I still find it interesting that they would come up with such similar ideas independently. Then again I'm pretty sure that Descartes wasn't the first person to have an existential crisis, and Democritus probably wasn't the first person to wonder whether matter is infinitely divisible.
I think what I find interesting here is that the ideas sprang from radically different systems of thought. The Buddha was born coming from Vedic (I think) philosophy, and the Stoics were coming from ancient Greek philosophy. They must have arrived at the same conclusion through very different routes.
 
  • #11
Gwilim said:
It wasn't 'knowledge' or 'science' because they didn't have experimental results to confirm their theories. Democritus did indeed come up with atomic theory, it's where our own word comes from.

Indeed, which is my point. In fact, neither did Dalton to any particular extent, but it spurred such empirical research that it deserves to be called the inception to the atomic theory.
 
  • #12
The other day I was re-reading some of Platos middle eriod dialogues and yesterday the Bhagavad Gita (a Hindu holy text written probably within 50 years of those dialogues) and they were expressing the exact same concepts in different literary styles.

Seriously, it's no accident that there is agreement among mystics.
 
  • #13
madness said:
I think what I find interesting here is that the ideas sprang from radically different systems of thought. The Buddha was born coming from Vedic (I think) philosophy, and the Stoics were coming from ancient Greek philosophy. They must have arrived at the same conclusion through very different routes.

How much do you know about Pythagoreanism? Their beliefs included the transmigration souls, as well as eventual release from this cycle through detatched contemplation, i.e. the gradual separation of the soul from the body during life. These ideas also feature in pre-Buddhist Indian philosophy. And they recur again and again throughout history, though in the case of Europe you have to look at more esoteric branches of religion such as Hermetism and Neoplatonism once Christianity took hold.
 
  • #14
Gwilim said:
The other day I was re-reading some of Platos middle eriod dialogues and yesterday the Bhagavad Gita (a Hindu holy text written probably within 50 years of those dialogues) and they were expressing the exact same concepts in different literary styles.

Seriously, it's no accident that there is agreement among mystics.

How do you say that? You mean Gita was inspired by Plato's dialogues? :o
 
  • #15
I interpreted Gwilim's post to mean that these are ideas which would come up again and again (perhaps because they hold some truth), not that one was copying the other. I'm sure if Plato and the ancient Indian's hadn't come up with these ideas, someone else would have.
 
  • #16
madness said:
Presumably these stoic philosophers had no knowledge of Buddhism and were not influenced by it? I know Schopenhauer had similar views on desire and the will, but he was quite heavily influenced by Buddhism and Indian religion such as the Upanishads.

Schopenhauer, according to Magee's biography, developed his views on desire and the will, before reading the Upanishads and Buddhist philosophy.
 
  • #17
That's interesting I didn't know that. In any case, he refers to Buddhism and the Upanishads in relation to his own beliefs in what I've read by him so they must have influenced his later work. He even once got rid of his maid for dusting his Buddha head statue.
 
Back
Top