MHB Are the coordinates of the vertices of this triangle all integers?

chucktingle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
L1 [x,y]=[2,1]+r[-5,1]
L2 [x,y]=[1,4]+s[2,1]
L3 [x,y]=[3,5]+t[4,-5]
These three lines are sides of a triangle
find: 1)the perimeter of the triangle
2) The largest angle
3) the centroid of the triangle

so I converted the vector equations into parametric, and then made two of the x parametric equations to equal each other to find the vertices.This gave me to vertices (-3,2), (7,0) and (3,5). The problem is the perimeter I get from those vertices is not an integer, I was told it would have no decimals. Am I going about the problem incorrectly? Once I have the vertices I can easily find the angle with cosine law, and use the centroid formula for the centroid, I am just not sure about the vertices I got.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I would convert to Cartesian coordinates:

$$L1\implies x+5y=7$$

$$L2\implies x-2y=-7$$

$$L3\implies 5x+4y=35$$

View attachment 6567

I agree with the vertices you found. And so the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=\sqrt{6^2+3^2}+\sqrt{4^2+5^2}+\sqrt{10^2+2^2}=3\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{41}+2\sqrt{26}$$

Is this what you have?
 

Attachments

  • triangle_vectors.png
    triangle_vectors.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 110
MarkFL said:
I think I would convert to Cartesian coordinates:

$$L1\implies x+5y=7$$

$$L2\implies x-2y=-7$$

$$L3\implies 5x+4y=35$$
I agree with the vertices you found. And so the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=\sqrt{6^2+3^2}+\sqrt{4^2+5^2}+\sqrt{10^2+2^2}=3\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{41}+2\sqrt{26}$$

Is this what you have?

Thanks for the reply, yep that's what I got. Maybe they rounded for the answer?
 
chucktingle said:
Thanks for the reply, yep that's what I got. Maybe they rounded for the answer?

I'm thinking that perhaps what was intended was that the coordinates of the 3 vertices would all be integers. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top