MHB Are the coordinates of the vertices of this triangle all integers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the vertices of a triangle defined by three vector equations. The calculated vertices are (-3,2), (7,0), and (3,5), but the resulting perimeter is not an integer, raising concerns about the calculations. The perimeter is expressed in terms of square roots, leading to speculation that the original problem may have intended for the vertices to be integers. Participants agree on the Cartesian conversions of the lines and confirm the perimeter calculations. The conversation concludes with the suggestion that the problem might have been misinterpreted regarding the integer requirement for the vertices.
chucktingle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
L1 [x,y]=[2,1]+r[-5,1]
L2 [x,y]=[1,4]+s[2,1]
L3 [x,y]=[3,5]+t[4,-5]
These three lines are sides of a triangle
find: 1)the perimeter of the triangle
2) The largest angle
3) the centroid of the triangle

so I converted the vector equations into parametric, and then made two of the x parametric equations to equal each other to find the vertices.This gave me to vertices (-3,2), (7,0) and (3,5). The problem is the perimeter I get from those vertices is not an integer, I was told it would have no decimals. Am I going about the problem incorrectly? Once I have the vertices I can easily find the angle with cosine law, and use the centroid formula for the centroid, I am just not sure about the vertices I got.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I would convert to Cartesian coordinates:

$$L1\implies x+5y=7$$

$$L2\implies x-2y=-7$$

$$L3\implies 5x+4y=35$$

View attachment 6567

I agree with the vertices you found. And so the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=\sqrt{6^2+3^2}+\sqrt{4^2+5^2}+\sqrt{10^2+2^2}=3\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{41}+2\sqrt{26}$$

Is this what you have?
 

Attachments

  • triangle_vectors.png
    triangle_vectors.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 113
MarkFL said:
I think I would convert to Cartesian coordinates:

$$L1\implies x+5y=7$$

$$L2\implies x-2y=-7$$

$$L3\implies 5x+4y=35$$
I agree with the vertices you found. And so the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=\sqrt{6^2+3^2}+\sqrt{4^2+5^2}+\sqrt{10^2+2^2}=3\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{41}+2\sqrt{26}$$

Is this what you have?

Thanks for the reply, yep that's what I got. Maybe they rounded for the answer?
 
chucktingle said:
Thanks for the reply, yep that's what I got. Maybe they rounded for the answer?

I'm thinking that perhaps what was intended was that the coordinates of the 3 vertices would all be integers. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top