Are the sum and the hypergeometric equal?

uart
Science Advisor
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
21
I was looking at finding a series solution to a 2nd order DE the other day and came up with the following (for one of the solutions, and there was a somewhat similar series for the other solution).

\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{3k}}{(3k)!} \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} (3m+1)

Wolfram said the solutions were the Airy functions Ai and Bi, and since these can be defined in terms of the Hypergeometric function, ~_0F_1, I suspected that the series I had might be equivalent to a hypergeometric. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AiryFunctions.html

Wolfram lists one of the hypergeometrics involved in Ai and Bi as, ~_0F_1(\frac{2}{3}, \frac{x^3}{9}). And when I expand this as per the definition here http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConfluentHypergeometricLimitFunction.html I get the following.

\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{3k}}{9^k \, k!} \left[ \prod_{m=0}^{k-1} (\frac{2}{3}+m) \right]^{-1}

When I sum these numerically in MATLAB I seem to get the same answer for both. I can see a lot of similarity but can't quite make out the equality of the two. Can anyone see any easy way to show they're equal?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ok I figured it out, and yes they are identical :)

I'm busy now but will post it later in anyone is interested.
 
OK, since I asked it I guess I should show a solution. It turned out to not be that difficult. Start in the obvious way by stripping away the bits that are already the same and writing just the bits that we require equality on.

(3k)!=9^k \, k! \prod_{m=0}^{k-1} (\frac{2}{3}+m) \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} (3m+1)

Splitting the 9^k into 3^k \, 3^k we can take one of these terms inside the fractional product to get.

(3k)! = 3^k \, k! \prod_{m=0}^{k-1} (3m + 2) \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} (3m+1)

Then with some simple rearrangements of the products we get.

(3k)! = 3^k \, k! \prod_{m=1}^{k} (3m - 1) \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} (3m+1)

(3k)! = 3^k \, k! \, \, (3k-1) \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} \left\{ (3m - 1) (3m+1) \right\}

From here it's pretty easy to see the equality. The product, (3k-1) \prod_{m=1}^{k-1} \left\{ (3m - 1) (3m+1) \right\} = 2 \cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \cdot 8 \cdot 10 \cdot 11 \ldots (3k-1), provides all the non factor 3 terms of (3k)!, while the "3^k \, k!" fills in all the factor three terms as 3^k \, k! = 3 \cdot 6 \cdot 9 \cdot 12 \ldots 3k.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top