MHB Are the Vectors S and T in the column of (ABC)

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomSavage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Column Vectors
TomSavage
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have no clue how to decode this question or do it but I was given the vectors S=[1 1 0] and T=[-1 0 1] and asked to determine whether or not they are in the column space of ABC when A, B and C are 3x3 matrices. My prof hinted to "think of rank and nullity", can someone please point me in the direction of the question cause as it stands right now I am lost, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Tom,

Hint 1: A vector is in the column space if it is a linear combination of the columns of the matrix.
Perhaps we can already visually see it.

Hint 2: We can find the rank of a matrix by Gaussian elimination and see how many vectors remain. Now add the vector in question, and repeat the elimination process. If we are left with an additional vector, it must have been independent of the original set, and is therefore not in the column space. Otherwise it was dependent, and is in the column space.

Hint 3: If we already have a full rank set of vectors, adding a vector cannot increase the rank. Then it must be dependent and in the column space.

Hint 4: If we know the rank of the null space, we can deduce the rank of the column space by the rank-nullity-theorem. That may help for hint 3 and hint 2.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top