Are There Nonzero Polynomial Associates in Zp[x]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chaotixmonjuish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of nonzero polynomials in the polynomial ring Zp[x], specifically focusing on the concept of associates and the assertion that a nonzero polynomial has p-1 associates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of "associates" and its implications for polynomials in Zp[x]. There are attempts to clarify what constitutes an associate and how many associates a polynomial might have. Some participants question whether the leading coefficient can be considered the only associate.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing definitions and attempting to clarify the concept of associates. There is an exploration of counting associates and ensuring that duplicates are not included. Some contradictions are noted, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of associates in the context of Zp[x], indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Show that a nonzero polynomial in Zp[x] has p-1 associates.

I don't have a proof as much as a fairly weak (in my opinion) argument.

Suppose you had a series of functions with coefficients p. If the coeffients are p in Zp[x], all those functions go to zero. In this case you just have a bunch of zeroes, which can't happen since there is no zero associate in Zp[x]. I think I may have butchered this proof as we just went over associates and I'm not sure how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the term; what's an "associate"?
 
An associate is a nonzero constant that a polynomial is multiplied by

e.q 2x+2 is 2(x+1)...2 is the associate
 
chaotixmonjuish said:
An associate is a nonzero constant that a polynomial is multiplied by

e.q 2x+2 is 2(x+1)...2 is the associate
Er... so "an associate of a polynomial" is simply "the leading coefficient of that polynomial"? But any polynomial would have only one associate then.
 
An associate is a nonzero constant multiple of a polynomial.
 
chaotixmonjuish said:
An associate is a nonzero constant multiple of a polynomial.
Ah, okay. Well... since each associate is determined by a "nonzero constant", we can simply count those, can't we? Well, we do have to make sure that the same associate isn't counted multiple times by this method. (Or make a correction if that does happen)
 
So here is what I got:

Suppose yyou have a polynomial x^n...+x+c such that p is an associate:

p*(x^n+...+x+c) => px^n+...+p*x+p*c => 0+...0+0

This contradicts the statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K