Are there really 9,460,000 km in a light year?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicist50
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the accurate measurement of a light year, with the original claim stating there are 9,460,000 km in a light year, which is incorrect. The correct calculation, based on the speed of light at 299,792,458 m/s, results in approximately 9.467 x 10^12 km in a light year. The discrepancy arises from a transcription error in the original post, where the figure was misreported. Participants confirm that the book's figure is a significant underestimation, likely due to rounding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the speed of light (299,792,458 m/s)
  • Basic knowledge of time conversion (seconds in a year)
  • Familiarity with scientific notation (e.g., 9.46 x 10^12)
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (km to m)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the speed of light and its implications in astrophysics
  • Learn about scientific notation and its applications in scientific calculations
  • Explore the concept of light years and their significance in astronomy
  • Investigate common rounding practices in scientific literature
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding astronomical distances and the speed of light.

Physicist50
Gold Member
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if my measurements book that states there are 9,460,000 km in a lightyear is correct. I raise this question because I have recently done some calculations that resulted in my answer being 90,450,800,000,000 km in a LY. How I got this; a light year is how far a light beam travels in a year, and there are 31,536,000 seconds in a year, (1x60x60x24x365). The typical speed light travels at is 300,000,000 m/s. So the obvious calculation to do is 300,000,000 x 31,536,000 ÷ 1,000, which is 9,460,800,000,000. Have I done something wrong in my calculations, or am I right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
You are right.
 
Thank you, and I thought books were the information source you can always rely on!
 
The speed of light is not actually 300,000 km per second, it is 299,792,458 m/s. (299,792 km/s) And your book is probably rounding anyways, which is perfectly fine with such a large number. It is not wrong.
Edit: Just noticed that your first number is missing like 6 zero's. Yeah, that's a BIT off...
 
Last edited:
If we are to take the original posting as an accurate reflection of the book then the book is off by a factor of about one million. Possibly it was intending to report a distance in millions of km.

On the other hand, OP reports two results, one of which is wrong due to an apparent transcription error and the second of which is good to three significant figures.

9.46 x 10^6 quoted from book
9.045 x 10^13 first reported by OP
9.46 x 10^12 next reported by OP
9.467 x 10^12 per my calculations.

The length of the tropical year is somewhat greater than 365 days. I used 365.25 as a better approximation.
 
jbriggs444 said:
...
9.46 x 10^6 quoted from book
9.045 x 10^13 first reported by OP
9.46 x 10^12 next reported by OP
9.467 x 10^12 per my calculations.

...

Without units these numbers are meaningless.
 
Integral said:
Without units these numbers are meaningless.

Good point. All figures were either intended or reported to be km/light-year.
 
Whoa, I just noticed the missing zero's in the OP's first post lol. Yeah, if that's what is quoted from the book then it's WAY off. Now I feel like a moron lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
731
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K