A Are two models with the same S matrix directly related by their parameters?

gonadas91
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
Hello, I was wondering if two models show the same S matrix by a direct relation between their parameters, does that necessarily mean that both models are exactly equivalent? My idea is that this is true, but would like to know about a solid argument about it if possible, thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
gonadas91 said:
Hello, I was wondering if two models show the same S matrix by a direct relation between their parameters, does that necessarily mean that both models are exactly equivalent? My idea is that this is true, but would like to know about a solid argument about it if possible, thank you!
No. Given an S-matrix to find a corresponding Hamiltonian is called the inverse scattering problem. It leads to a unique solution only under appropriate additional constraints - otherwise there are infinitely many solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Thank you for the reply. But imagine I have two S matrices, one for one model and another one for a different one. Say that the parameter "a" for the first model has a relation with "b" in the second one, this is a relation between their coupling constants just like the sine-Gordon and Thirring models. Then, when finding the rapidities distribution under Bethe ansatz, the kernel of the integral equation is the same, the rapidities distribution is the same for both models, and then the eigenvalues are the same. Doesn't this reflect an equivalence class between the two models then?
 
gonadas91 said:
Say that the parameter "a" for the first model has a relation with "b" in the second one, this is a relation between their coupling constants just like the sine-Gordon and Thirring models. Then, when finding the rapidities distribution under Bethe ansatz, the kernel of the integral equation is the same, the rapidities distribution is the same for both models, and then the eigenvalues are the same. Doesn't this reflect an equivalence class between the two models then?
Sometimes, as in the case of sine-Gordon and Thirring, this is the case. But one needs to find a separate argument to give a conclusive proof, as the general answer is negative. Physicists generally assume equivalence if integrable systems have identical S-matrices, but a proof of that in any particular case may be quite difficult as there is no general theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes gonadas91
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top