Are we not already travelling at the speed of light?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the speed of light, with a newcomer to physics questioning whether humans are already traveling at this speed. Forum members clarify that the speed of light (c) is a constant that cannot be achieved by objects with mass, as one cannot transform to the rest frame of a photon. They emphasize the need for proper citations to discuss specific readings or theories. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding fundamental physics principles for newcomers. Overall, the idea that we are traveling at the speed of light is dismissed by experienced members.
ClintWalker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This isn't for any homework or coursework. I am new to physics and have decided to embrace my inner geek that i have been suppressing for 30 years.

Some light reading recently has pointed out to me that the speed of light is not a constant velocity we should hope to achieve but the speed at which we are already travelling.

Can someone explain this to me?
 
Science news on Phys.org
ClintWalker said:
This isn't for any homework or coursework. I am new to physics and have decided to embrace my inner geek that i have been suppressing for 30 years.

Some light reading recently has pointed out to me that the speed of light is not a constant velocity we should hope to achieve but the speed at which we are already travelling.

Can someone explain this to me?

We can't explain what you read without you citing the proper source, something we require in this forum.

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=2703

And no, we cannot be traveling at c. We cannot transform to the rest frame of the photon.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ZapperZ said:
We can't explain what you read without you citing the proper source, something we require in this forum.

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=2703

And no, we cannot be traveling at c. We cannot transform to the rest frame of the photon.

Zz.

thanks. I am new in here obviously
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
16K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K