Areas of a series of annular sectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Series
jfox
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Hoping someone can figure out a problem. In the attached figure, A is the area of openings in a disc. Assume the segments 82, 84, 86, 88 are along a radius and are equal. Is it possible to prove that A4/A3 > A3/A2 > A2/A1?


In thanks I'll share this, hope it's not old news. Some wit wrote it on a bathroom wall when I was an undergrad, I still think it's funny.


\sqrt{(Doing)^{2} + (Being)^{2}}= Doobee\,Doobee\,BingDing

J Fox
 

Attachments

  • Series of Sectors.jpg
    Series of Sectors.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 462
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Never mind. Trying an idealized example of r=R, .75R, .5R, .25R it comes down to

A4\propto 12-.752
A3\propto .752-.52
A2\propto .52-.252

A4/A3 < A3/A2

But it was cool to find the math font/language!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top