AreKirchoff's laws of Current and Voltage interchangeable?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter C. Long
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Laws Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interchangeability of Kirchhoff's laws of current and voltage, focusing on their applications in circuit analysis. Participants explore the mathematical implications and conventions associated with these laws, as well as their interpretations in various circuit scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) typically yields currents when applied to loop equations, while Kirchhoff's current law (KCL) yields voltages when applied to nodal equations.
  • There is a suggestion that KVL and KCL are not interchangeable, as they serve different purposes in circuit analysis.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the sign conventions for voltage across batteries and resistors, indicating that their professor's explanations vary.
  • Another participant explains the passive sign convention, stating that when current enters a resistor from the positive terminal, the voltage drop is considered positive, while the opposite is true when moving against the current across a battery.
  • There is a discussion about the proper formulation of Kirchhoff's laws in terms of voltage drops and current directions, emphasizing the importance of consistency in defining these parameters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic principles of Kirchhoff's laws, but there is no consensus on the interchangeability of the laws or the sign conventions used in different scenarios. Confusion remains regarding the application of these conventions in practice.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct application of sign conventions in various circuit elements, and there are unresolved questions about the mathematical utility of the laws in their stated forms.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in electrical engineering or physics who are grappling with the application of Kirchhoff's laws in circuit analysis and the associated conventions.

C. Long
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Specifically the equations you get when you examine the loops in a circuit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here. If you're wondering whether they're both valid fo whatever circuit you come across, then yes, they are. The difference is that the application of kirchhoffs voltage law (using loop equations) usually yields currents whereas you get voltages from Kirchoff's current law (when applied to get nodal equations).

Otherwise, kirchhoffs current law is basically a statement that current is preserved (it isn't created or destroyed), and Kirchoff's voltage law says that if you walk around the planet (a loop) and end up at the same spot, you're at the exact same elevation (voltage) as when you started.

So, if that's what you're asking, then they're not really "interchangeable". They're two different important laws.
 
axmls said:
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here. If you're wondering whether they're both valid fo whatever circuit you come across, then yes, they are. The difference is that the application of kirchhoffs voltage law (using loop equations) usually yields currents whereas you get voltages from Kirchoff's current law (when applied to get nodal equations).

Otherwise, kirchhoffs current law is basically a statement that current is preserved (it isn't created or destroyed), and Kirchoff's voltage law says that if you walk around the planet (a loop) and end up at the same spot, you're at the exact same elevation (voltage) as when you started.

So, if that's what you're asking, then they're not really "interchangeable". They're two different important laws.

You get currents from the voltage law and voltages from the current law?
 
Yes. The laws in their stated forms aren't very mathematically useful. So, for instance, if you want to write Kirchoff's voltage law around a single loop, instead of writing [itex]V_1 + V_1 + V_s = 0[/itex], you could write [itex]i R_1 + i R_2 + V_s = 0[/itex] (this example is a single loop circuit, so there's only one current and it's through all the elements), and we know the resistances and the source voltage, so we can find a current, and that's from Kirchoff's voltage law.
 
axmls said:
Yes. The laws in their stated forms aren't very mathematically useful. So, for instance, if you want to write Kirchoff's voltage law around a single loop, instead of writing [itex]V_1 + V_1 + V_s = 0[/itex], you could write [itex]i R_1 + i R_2 + V_s = 0[/itex] (this example is a single loop circuit, so there's only one current and it's through all the elements), and we know the resistances and the source voltage, so we can find a current, and that's from Kirchoff's voltage law.
Alright I think I see. I'm a little confused on the direction across batteries and resistors in terms of if the term is positive or negative. Our professor seems to flip flop; sometimes if the current is going neg to pos across the battery it's a positive voltage and other times it's a negative voltage.
 
Last edited:
Well, in passive convention, you assume a direction of the current, then every time you come across a resistor, you have the current entering the + voltage and leaving the - voltage. Whether you choose that to be positive or negative in your loop equation is irrelevant, but make sure that if you pass a voltage going from - to +, you use the opposite sign on that one.
 
It is the usual convention that when going with the current from a high potential to a low ie. + to - as you would in a resistor that the voltage drop is taken as positive because work was done on the current. But when you from - to + as in a battery you must do work to get to the higher potential land this voltage drop is take as negative. So in a simple circuit in which a resistor is connected to a battery Kirchhoff's voltage law say the sum of the voltage drops around a loop must sum to zero i.e, Vr + Vb =0. So since the voltage drop across the battery and the resistor is the same say V then Kirchhoff's law is V+ (-V) = 0 of course which it obviously is. So when going with the current across a resistor, capacitor or inductor take the voltage drop as positive. When going against the current take these voltage drops as negative. But with a battery do just the opposite. And remember to write Kirchhoff's law in this form ∑ V = 0 around a loop when substituting in for the voltage drops

For Kirchhoff's current law ∑I = 0 for currents entering and leaving a node or junction you can take currents entering as positive and leaving as negative. . Remember the current stays in the same direction through a series connected branch.

Choose your currents first then determine the voltage drops. Usually start a the principle power source + terminal and proceed to the first node and continue through the circuit until you reach the - terminal of the principle power source combining and defining current directions in a consistent manner. Keep in mind that the current leaving the battery is the same as entering it.
 
Hey thanks guys I think I understand this now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K