How did Kepler derive his laws WITHOUT law of gravitation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on how Johannes Kepler derived his laws of planetary motion without the knowledge of Newton's law of gravitation. Participants explore the role of observations in Kepler's formulation of the first law, which states that planets follow elliptical paths, and the implications of this for understanding motion in the solar system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Kepler's laws were derived purely from observations, without the need for a force law.
  • Others note that Kepler gained access to Tycho Brahe's extensive observational data, which he used to model the solar system as heliocentric and to determine that planets orbit in ellipses.
  • One participant mentions that Kepler did not develop an explanation for why planets followed elliptical paths, focusing instead on the patterns observed.
  • Another point raised is that Kepler's work was influenced by the prevailing belief in circular orbits and epicircles, which were common at the time.
  • Some participants highlight that Newton later showed that an inverse square central force law could explain Kepler's observations, but Kepler himself did not start with a force law.
  • There is a mention that Newton's law of gravitation, like Kepler's laws, was also based on observations, suggesting a parallel in their methodologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Kepler's laws were based on observational data, but there is no consensus on the implications of this or the completeness of his approach. Multiple competing views regarding the nature of Kepler's derivation and the role of force laws remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on historical context and the evolving understanding of motion and forces in astronomy. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations of Kepler's methodology and the influence of contemporary beliefs about planetary motion.

Hansa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hansa said:
Was it purely based on observations?

I believe it was.
 
As far as I understand, Kepler gained access to all of Tycho Brahe's astronomical observational data when Tycho Brahe died. He used this data to model the solar system as heliocentric, with the planets orbiting the Sun in ellipses. He never developed an explanation for why they did this.
 
Thanks, that answers the question. :)
 
To use an movement low like ## x(t) = x_0 + v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 ## I needn't any law of force or any other reason of motion. The motion is that I observe.
 
Hansa said:
Was it purely based on observations?

Is there another way?
 
andresB said:
Is there another way?
The alternative is to start with a force law and see what motion it predicts.

Kepler did not use a force law. He started with observations and determined a pattern of motion -- a traversal of an elliptical path at a rate determined by "equal areas in equal times". Newton was able to show after the fact that an inverse square central force law was consistent with this.
 
Hansa said:
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
According to a recent book, On the Shoulders of Giants, edited by Stephen Hawking, Kepler was hired by Tycho Brahe, who was an expert naked eye astronomer, to make sense of his observations of Mars. That was when Kepler found the planet was describing an ellipse.
 
  • #10
I think Kepler not just get data from Thycho, but Kepler continue Thycho's work
 
  • #11
Kepler continued to work in Tycho's observatory, but he had poor vision (relatively poor, near sighted, could read w/o difficulty) and could not really use any of the instruments. And Galileo's telescope was starting to be distributed so that Tycho's tools were obsolete within a few years of his death as well. Everyone WANTED to believe orbits were perfectly circular or were composed of epicircles (circles within circles). This idea could replicate the orbit of Mars to a very close approximation. Kepler also did NOT want to accept Tycho's observations, but knew Tycho was too good of an observer to not use his data.
 
  • #12
Hansa said:
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
The funny thing is that Newton's law of gravitation is also based on observations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K