Artifical gravity on spaceships

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
  • #61
We don't know. 1g and 0g are the only points where we have long-term data.
 
on Phys.org
  • #62
trainman2001 said:
It doesn’t have to be 1g, does it? How much below 1g would humans still be able to retain normal biological functions and musculoskeletal integrity. It would be considerably less energy to accelerate at 1/3 g than 1g, or to spin a habitat to that level. It all depends on what we need to thrive over the long haul. Living on Mars or Moon at their reduced gravities would tell us a lot.
It's likely that physiological effects vary with g (maybe even proportionally), but there are many practical reasons why partial g might be of value. Just the part about everything not physically attached to a wall floating away is a big issue.
 
  • #63
I think another big plus would be the accomodation of natural bodily functions. I get the impression that zero-gee toilets are not for the faint of heart.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345 and GTOM
  • #64
russ_watters said:
It's likely that physiological effects vary with g (maybe even proportionally), but there are many practical reasons why partial g might be of value. Just the part about everything not physically attached to a wall floating away is a big issue.
Variable gee would be useful for outbound and homebound voyages from Mars where the acclimation could be done gradually and naturally each way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K