Artificial Means of Jumping Higher

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haftred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Means
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores methods to artificially increase jump height, primarily focusing on the limitations of using springs due to the impracticality of achieving necessary compression and spring constants. Alternatives like rockets and robotic leg devices are suggested, though concerns about safety at high acceleration are noted. The conversation also highlights the potential of trampolines and specific techniques, such as using both legs for takeoff, to enhance jumping ability. Additionally, the influence of springy surfaces in gymnastics is mentioned as a factor in achieving greater heights. Overall, various innovative approaches to augmenting jump height are considered, emphasizing the importance of kinetic energy addition.
Haftred
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I am looking to see if there is a discrete way to increase the height one can jump, and the only way I could see it feasibly being done is with a spring. However, the spring could only realistically be supressed a few centimeters, and the spring constant needed would need to be relatively large, say 100,000 N / m. Even if there were a spring with this large spring constant, it would be almost impossible to supress it the needed few centimeters. Therefore, it seems that springs would not do anything. Any ideas about artificial means of jumping higher?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, except after a certain point, the acceleration you experience would kill you. You could use some sort of rockets, robotic leg type devices, etc.
 
It's kind of a quirky question. If you jump onto a spring and simultaneously jump again, you are using the spring's stored energy from your fall plus the energy you are exerting to jump again.

So really what you are asking is, "how can I add kinetic energy", and there's a LOT of ways to do that!
 
What about a trampoline? If you're referring to the rules of a high jump in track events, note that the rules require that only one leg is planted. If a gynmastics type flip flop move were allowed, using a two foot take off, the height would be much larger. If the surface were allowed to be springy, as in power tumbling (not an olympic event), the heights are quite high.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top