A Asymptotic Flatness: Minkowski Spacetime & Galaxy Scale

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Angelika10
  • Start date Start date
Angelika10
Messages
37
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
In derivation of the standard form of a spherical symmetric metric, always the assumption is made: minkowski spacetime is in the infinity. Why is this done?
In derivation of the standard form of a spherical symmetric metric, always the assumption is made: minkowski spacetime is in the infinity. Why is this done? Could it be violated/not true? For example on the galaxy scale?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angelika10 said:
Summary:: In derivation of the standard form of a spherical symmetric metric, always the assumption is made: minkowski spacetime is in the infinity. Why is this done?

In derivation of the standard form of a spherical symmetric metric, always the assumption is made: minkowski spacetime is in the infinity. Why is this done? Could it be violated/not true? For example on the galaxy scale?
It's a question of physical viability. What you're asking is why the gravitational effect of the Sun, for example, reduces with distance and eventually becomes negligible?

If it didn't, then the Earth would be significantly affected by the gravity of every star in the galaxy; plus every star in Andromeda.

There's no evidence for this. All the evidence points at the Sun having the only really significant effect.

In terms of asymptotic behaviour, the absolute mass is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes Angelika10
PeroK said:
What you're asking is why the gravitational effect of the Sun, for example, reduces with distance and eventually becomes negligible?
That is not entirely true. Even in the case of a spherically symmetric mass distribution in Newtonian gravity - you still have the option of an external field with zero divergence. This field is generally not considered to be part of the effect ”from the Sun”, but it does affect the boundary conditions.

The general idea however is that you want spacetime to be essentially Minkowski space far away from any sources or singularities.
 
  • Like
Likes Angelika10
PeroK said:
It's a question of physical viability. What you're asking is why the gravitational effect of the Sun, for example, reduces with distance and eventually becomes negligible?
I fully agree for the asymptotical flatness of the solar system. It's measured with high precision.
But why do we assume the galaxy asymptotically flat?

PeroK said:
If it didn't, then the Earth would be significantly affected by the gravity of every star in the galaxy; plus every star in Andromeda.
Because flatness means "no influence of gravity" if we assume that gravity is the same as curvature of spacetime. I understand that.

But, in analogy to electrodynamics: There is "no field" the asymptotic, not "flat field", as in general relativity. Why can't we assume this? Something like "vanishing spacetime" in the infinity?
 
Orodruin said:
The general idea however is that you want spacetime to be essentially Minkowski space far away from any sources or singularities.
Yes, I see. But how do we know that it doesn't become "the opposite of minkowski" as it approaches infinity?

While deriving a metric from the standard form

##ds^2 = B(r)c^2dt^2 - A(r)dr^2 -r^2(d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2)##

It's always assumed that B(r) and A(r) approach to 1. I know that it's highly speculative, but could they divert from 1 in the infinity (B approching \infty, A approaching 0)?
 
Angelika10 said:
Why can't we assume this? Something like "vanishing spacetime" in the infinity?
This makes no sense.

Angelika10 said:
I know that it's highly speculative
Yes, which means it's out of bounds for PF discussion, since we do not allow discussion of personal speculations. Instead of spending time speculating, you should be spending your time learning how the models used in astronomy and cosmology actually work and why they make the assumptions they do.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top