Atmosphere, Kinetic, related question.

AI Thread Summary
In normal atmospheric conditions, the kinetic energy of water molecules in hot vapor is indeed higher than that of water molecules in liquid form. This is because molecular kinetic energy directly correlates with temperature; hotter substances have more energetic molecules. When comparing water at 70 degrees Fahrenheit to water vapor at 30 degrees Fahrenheit, the water molecules in the liquid state will have higher kinetic energy due to the temperature difference. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between temperature and kinetic energy in different states of water. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping thermodynamic principles.
droomagon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a relative simple question, but I'd like to double check with you folks.

Typically, in normal atmosphere the kinetic energy of water molecules in water, should be lower than the kinetic energy of water molecule in hot vapor, isn't that right?

Thank you!

/cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Molecular Kinetic energy determines the temperature, so the hotter the water (vapor) the higher the kinetic energy of the molecules.
 
kinetic energy of water molecules

Here is one thing I want to ask about.

Say, we have water at 70deg. and water vapor at 30deg. Whose molecules will have a higher kinetic energy.

spacetime
http://www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
Re-read my previous post.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top