Atmospheric physics / geophysics.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around career advice in the fields of atmospheric physics and geophysics, particularly focusing on the controversial idea of climate control through the injection of volcanic ash into the atmosphere. Participants explore educational pathways, research opportunities, and the implications of such interventions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in pursuing research on climate control via volcanic ash injection, seeking career advice in atmospheric physics and geophysics.
  • Another participant suggests that career prospects in this specific area may be limited and recommends considering environmental science or engineering instead.
  • A participant mentions the importance of taking atmospheric physics classes and suggests exploring aerosol research, highlighting the uncertainties in understanding its effects on Earth's temperature.
  • Further elaboration on the topic includes the acknowledgment of past weather manipulation efforts, such as cloud seeding, while questioning the practicality and potential unintended consequences of large-scale climate manipulation.
  • One participant proposes that studying the impacts of specific volcanic eruptions could be more productive for improving modeling and predictive capabilities in atmospheric science.
  • Another suggestion is made to explore atmospheric or Earth sciences, with the possibility of pursuing studies in chemistry or physics related to phase transitions and nucleation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the viability of careers in atmospheric physics and geophysics, particularly regarding the controversial method of climate control through volcanic ash. There is no consensus on the best approach or the practicality of such research.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects uncertainties regarding the effectiveness and consequences of climate manipulation techniques, as well as the varying perspectives on career paths within atmospheric sciences.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals interested in atmospheric physics, geophysics, environmental science, and climate research may find this discussion relevant.

Aerozeppelin
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm a 2nd year applied physics student in university and I'm wondering if anyone has advice on careers in atmospheric physics / geophysics.

Although it is controversial I would like to go into the field of research of climate control by injecting volcanic ash into the atmosphere.

Does anyone know how I should go about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say the career aspects of something like that is bleak at best. Perhaps something like environmental science or engineering would be better suited for you career wise.
 
Have you taken atmospheric physics classes? Aerosol research might be something that interests you in general - maybe check that out. It's also a field where people don't really know that much about how it affects temperature of the Earth (really huge uncertainties) so there's room to make progress.
 
Aerozeppelin said:
I'm a 2nd year applied physics student in university and I'm wondering if anyone has advice on careers in atmospheric physics / geophysics.

Although it is controversial I would like to go into the field of research of climate control by injecting volcanic ash into the atmosphere.

Does anyone know how I should go about this?
Certainly understanding terrestrial atmospheric physics and geophysics are important, as well as being very interesting.

Manipulation of weather and climate has been done, e.g., seeding of clouds. And there are folks who would propose to manipulate climate on a large scale. However, the practicality is questionable, and there are always the potential for unintended (and often unforeseen) consequences.

There are a number of volcanoes that already injected huge volumes of volcanic ash into the atmosphere. It may be more productive to study the impact of specific volcanic eruptions and thereby improve the modeling/simulation and predictive capabilities of models.

See for example - Tungurahua
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungurahua
http://www.volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=352080

or others like Merapi (Indonesia), Ubinas (Peru), etc
http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports_weekly.cfm
 
Look into atmospheric or Earth sciences. It is also possible to do in chemistry or physics departments (some scientists in both groups looking into phase transitions/nucleation/etc).
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K