Atomic clock used in spaceships

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of atomic clocks in spaceships as a reference for understanding the special theory of relativity. Participants explore the implications of time dilation, the nature of time, and the differences in clock measurements from varying frames of reference. The conversation includes both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why atomic clocks are preferred over analog clocks in relativity discussions, suggesting that both should show the same time if they are synchronized.
  • Another participant argues that the accuracy of atomic clocks is necessary to detect small relativistic effects, as demonstrated in experiments like the Hafele-Keating experiment.
  • It is noted that the key issue is the relative motion between two clocks rather than their location inside or outside a spaceship.
  • Some participants assert that all clocks slow down due to time dilation, which has been confirmed by numerous experiments.
  • There is a discussion about the mechanisms of clocks, with some arguing that while the mechanisms are the same, their perceived operation differs across frames of reference.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the nature of time, questioning why it only moves in one direction and whether it can be considered a physical quantity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation of clock behavior in different frames of reference and the nature of time itself. There is no consensus on the implications of using different types of clocks or the fundamental understanding of time.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the accuracy of clocks and the nature of time are dependent on specific definitions and assumptions that remain unresolved in the discussion.

AnilML
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Not sure how stupid my question might be. Could anyone please clarify me, why the atomic clock in a spaceship is taken as a reference while explaining a special theory of relativity?. I always wonder how 2 people one outside the spaceship and the other inside it feels about a time in 2 different manner. and this problem exists only when I carry an atomic clock inside a spaceship (for the reference of a time). If i carry an analog clock(run by a battery), both the people inside and outside the spaceship can see the same time right.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it doesn't matter what kind of clock you use. In real-world experiments such as the Hafele-Keating experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele-Keating_experiment , they use atomic clocks because the relativistic effects are small, so you need a very accurate clock in order to detect them.

It's only because the effect is the same on all clocks that we can consider time dilation as an effect on time rather than an effect on the specific internal mechanisms of some type of clock.
 
And it's not being inside or outside a spaceship that is the issue, it's one clock traveling at some speed in relation to another clock. We just like to put the people in the spaceships so that they can breathe and have a means of propulsion so that the clocks can get up to a speed difference between them. So sometimes we talk about people in two spaceships traveling and sometimes we talk about people in just one spaceship while the people outside remain on Earth where, of course, breathing is not a problem and where they have their own clock. Remember, two clocks are involved and when there is a speed difference between them, meaning they are either getting closer together or getting farther apart, then each will determine that the others clock is ticking slower than their own.
 
Thanks a lot.. a lot... But my little brain thinks, ( analog clock ) the mechanism which moves the needle of a clock will always be same in all the frame of references. so the 2 guys one in spaceship and other stands outside must see the same needle movement of a clock. And why should a person assumes atomic clock is the accurate one.. Instead of thinking about time dilation and space contraction..etc, one can simply thinks the way we have understood what the light is might be wrong. Or one can simply think atomic clock is not accurate. right ?

I ll be eagerly waiting for your clarification sir. Thanks a lot again..
 
Are you saying the analog clock is accurate while the atomic clock in the same circumstance is inaccurate?
 
AnilML said:
But my little brain thinks, ( analog clock ) the mechanism which moves the needle of a clock will always be same in all the frame of references. so the 2 guys one in spaceship and other stands outside must see the same needle movement of a clock.

Your intuition is wrong. As bcrowell said, all clocks slow down because time itself slows down. This has been verified by many, many experiments.
 
AnilML said:
( analog clock ) the mechanism which moves the needle of a clock will always be same in all the frame of references. so the 2 guys one in spaceship and other stands outside must see the same needle movement of a clock.

The mechanism that moves the needle is the same in all frames of reference - what's different is the speed at which all mechanisms, including that one, appear to operate when viewed from different frames of reference. Use a mechanical clock operated by a pendulum, and the moving observer will measure a different speed for the pendulum, and hence a different slower tick rate for the clock, than will the observer at rest relative to the pendulum.
 
Nugatory said:
The mechanism that moves the needle is the same in all frames of reference - what's different is the speed at which all mechanisms, including that one, appear to operate when viewed from different frames of reference. Use a mechanical clock operated by a pendulum, and the moving observer will measure a different speed for the pendulum, and hence a different slower tick rate for the clock, than will the observer at rest relative to the pendulum.
Einstein said a balance clock is preferred. A pendulum clock is dependent on gravity and not good.
 
Hello friends, I have small doubt here. what the time actually is ? in relativity experiments the differences found in measurements only, I feel the time is something other than physical quantity it has only positive direction, right? If we consider the time as a fourth dimension why it is not possible for us to go in negative direction? please clarify this , Thanks
 
  • #10
sunil83_nie said:
Hello friends, I have small doubt here. what the time actually is ? in relativity experiments the differences found in measurements only, I feel the time is something other than physical quantity it has only positive direction, right? If we consider the time as a fourth dimension why it is not possible for us to go in negative direction? please clarify this , Thanks
Spacetime is comprised of three space-like dimensions and one time-like dimension. One of the characteristics of time-like dimensions is that we can only move in one direction through it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K