Atomic Model of Hadrons mass of excited particles

cooev769
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
So in a lecture I'm reading up on we are given questions to answer during the lectures with no answers, and for this particular lecture the answer has been omitted and it is in none of our textbooks.

But basically it says that a proton and a sigma plus, both have the same quark composition and hence should have the same mass, but the sigma + has a great mass than the proton. Basically the sigma + has a greater energy, but this seems weird to me because as an object gains energy does that necessarily mean it gains mass? I thought that was only in relativity as the variable mass, which is actually fallacious and that mass is actually a lorentz scalar.

Can anybody explain this difference in mass to me clearly?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like in an atom when the electrons are in excited states, higher energy levels, I've never heard that this means that the electrons have a greater mass. When you accelerate an electron and it gains energy I've never heard that it gains mass.
 
Sorry I mean delta plus not sigma plus.
 
"mass" can mean a lot of things. The equation
E=mc^2
only holds for a system at rest, otherwise we need to include the momentum terms.
E^2 -(pc)^2 = (mc^2)^2

That "m" there is indeed a Lorentz scalar as you mentioned. It is also called the rest mass.

So for an atom, the rest mass _does_ depend on what energy level the electrons are in. It just turns out this energy difference is very small compared to the rest mass of the atom's nucleus and so it is basically negligible. For the light baryons though, the mass of the quarks is quite small compared to the 'strong field' interaction energy. So it shouldn't be too much of a surprise that the energy level difference (and hence mass difference) of different excited states is a sizable fraction of the ground state.
 
cooev769 said:
Like in an atom when the electrons are in excited states, higher energy levels, I've never heard that this means that the electrons have a greater mass. When you accelerate an electron and it gains energy I've never heard that it gains mass.

You cannot treat the particles as separate entities when bound together in an atom. They compose a system and it is the system as a whole, aka the whole atom, that gains mass.
 
cooev769 said:
But basically it says that a proton and a sigma plus, both have the same quark composition and hence should have the same mass
No. Why should they? They are different particles, and most of their rest energy (and therefore most of the mass) comes from QCD anyway.

An excited atom is heavier than an atom in its ground-state, but the difference is extremely tiny (of the order of 10-9 of the total mass).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
155
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top