Atomic positioning with DNA hinges - Comments

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter klotza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Dna Hinges
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the emerging field of atomic positioning using DNA hinges, highlighting its potential to revolutionize nano-mechanics and nanobot construction. Participants express excitement about the implications of DNA origami and supramolecular chemistry in creating functional nanoscale devices. While the authors claim to achieve molecular positioning with "Bohr radius" accuracy, the actual precision is estimated to be around 0.5 nm, which remains significant. The conversation reflects a strong interest in the future applications of this technology, including DIY kits for nanobots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of DNA origami techniques
  • Familiarity with supramolecular chemistry concepts
  • Knowledge of nano-mechanics principles
  • Basic grasp of molecular positioning accuracy metrics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in DNA origami for functional applications
  • Explore the latest developments in supramolecular chemistry
  • Investigate current projects in nano-mechanics and nanobot design
  • Learn about molecular positioning techniques and their accuracy measurements
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, chemists, and engineers interested in nanotechnology, particularly those focused on DNA-based systems and molecular engineering applications.

klotza
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
80
Reaction score
113
klotza submitted a new PF Insights post

Atomic Positioning with DNA Hinges

alexdna-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andy Resnick and Greg Bernhardt
Biology news on Phys.org
This is going to be a new category in physics soon? Nano-mechanics? It makes me want to build nanobots!
 
jerromyjon said:
This is going to be a new category in physics soon? Nano-mechanics? It makes me want to build nanobots!

You're not the only one interested in nanobots: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/making-a-voltron-out-of-dna.807896/ (of course, the DNA origami nanobot in that article only looks like a robot, but doesn't actually do anything). Here's a news piece from Nature discussion chemists efforts to build nanoscale parts to generate molecular scale motion: http://www.nature.com/news/the-tini...cale-motors-rotors-switches-and-pumps-1.18262 The article focuses mostly on supramolecular chemistry, though one could imagine trying to design DNA nanostructures capable of such functions as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
jerromyjon said:
It makes me want to build nanobots!
I could see DIY kits out by Christmas :biggrin:
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I could see DIY kits out by Christmas :biggrin:
I was thinking the same thing! I just couldn't think of anything other than nanorobotic drain opener, and I doubt that's on anyone but the plumber's x-mas list.

Oooh, nanorobotic paint scrapers, too! I could use a few bucketfuls of those. :eek: I suppose they should collect lead as well...

Why can't I think of anything fun...
 
Last edited:
aroc91 said:
I haven't seen anything more recent on the topic.
Me either. Anything in this realm attracts my interest! Having such fine angle control the first thing I'd want to make is atomic pinwheels to see if we can figure out how to make it do something...
 
Three statisticians are playing darts in a bar. The first steps up to the line, throws his dart and misses wide left. The second statistician takes his turn, and misses wide right, at which point the third statistician yells "bullseye!"

After having time to read the full paper, this is my impression of the claim that the authors can position molecules with "Bohr radius" accuracy. Yes, they can construct structures where they molecules with an accuracy of 0.04 nm, but the precision with which they can place the molecules is an order of magnitude larger (~0.5 nm from the authors' estimates). The result is still impressive and useful, though claims of Bohr radius resolution may be a bit overblown.
 
  • #10
I wasn't thinking of positioning of atoms as into piece together parts, like on a workbench. I was thinking of the DNA backbone as the "bench" to assemble pieces within itself, similar to protein mechanics. I am quite fuzzy on what actually is state of the "art", as Greg called it... I think there might be a lot more going on behind the scenes or there should be! I can only imagine how much potential this field has and I can't make out many challenges it couldn't help overcome.
 
  • #11
Dear staff
i wowed a lot about this topic
thanks a lot
 
  • #12
The possible places this could lead to in 20 years blows my mind. Hope I'm around to see it developed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K