Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Insights Interview with Biologist Jim McNamara - Comments

  1. Jun 7, 2017 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 7, 2017 #2

    DrClaude

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Nice @jim mcnamara!

    I don't know if I should blame you or @Greg Bernhardt, but the interview includes one of my pet peeves: the precise conversion of an approximate value:
     
  4. Jun 7, 2017 #3

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    And I agree - imprecise conversions aren't necessarily valid or helpful.

    What would you suggest? ~65 miles (~104km)? Since you cannot know, part of the commute was over unimproved dirt roads. Sections were sometimes impassable requiring making the distance quite variable. Sometimes in Winter, only the "long way" through Santa Fe was open, exactly 86.4 miles of paved roads.

    FWIW - the commute went from Santo Domingo, up over the Dome road to La Cueva NM. This is pointless detail, except that it is my experience sometimes it is difficult for non-locals to perceive how very undeveloped vast areas of New Mexico are. After the May 2000 Cerro Grande forest fire (that destroyed part of Los Alamos), the dome road was closed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerro_Grande_Fire

    FWIW: New Mexico is notoriously hard to deal with for a lot of people. Lew Wallace (author of Ben Hur, and territorial governor of NM) quote:
    All calculations based on our experiences elsewhere fail in New Mexico.
    This is in large part quite true. Example see above - a simple commute? No. :smile:
     
  5. Jun 7, 2017 #4

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    65.0 miles (103km). :smile:

    Great interview -- thanks Jim!
     
  6. Jun 8, 2017 #5

    DrClaude

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I would have rounded it the same way as if it would have been originally in km: "it was about 100 km one way."
     
  7. Jun 12, 2017 #6
    Maybe if he wrote it like "It was about (65 miles, 104 Km)?" Then it would kind of be like the distributive rule applied to approximation?
     
  8. Jun 12, 2017 #7
    "Give us some predictions for the next 100 years of biology science breakthroughs.

    I think the integration of human neural input/output with embedded nanotechnology will come to the forefront. There are now “smart” very small hearing aids that improve hearing greatly over past much larger models. I expect many kinds of smaller neurally integrated devices to become de rigueur, much in the way cell phone technology has done."


    I'd suggest checking out the latest issue of IEEE spectrum. It's a special issue on the brain and AI and discusses the latest progress on these topics. The department/lab I'm in at my university just got a hardcopy recently and I stole it today :-p. I think you can access part or all of the content online, though:

    http://spectrum.ieee.org/magazine
     
  9. Jun 13, 2017 #8

    DrClaude

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    My point is that nobody talking in km would say "about 104 km."
     
  10. Jun 15, 2017 #9

    StatGuy2000

    User Avatar
    Education Advisor

    Hi @jim mcnamara ! I saw your interview with Greg on Insights. I was curious about your experience on the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico. You state that the Navajo language is in serious decline now, but I've read elsewhere that there are major revitalization efforts to try to preserve and grow the language in the Reservation.

    Given your knowledge, do you have any idea of how successful the efforts are? And doyou personally feel that the Navajo language will survive as a viable language of the community?

    (To moderators: I realize that my post has nothing to do with biology or medicine, but it is a follow-up to his experiences living on a native reservation.)
     
  11. Jun 15, 2017 #10

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    [opinion]
    See: http://www.roughrock.k12.az.us/Welcome.htm

    This does work rather well. However, there are few jobs on the reservation. Many young people leave, often because of non-Navajo spouses, and the kids never learn Navajo. They are on the tribal roles, but they are not active members. Plus, a Navajo who is not fluent in English has limited job prospects off the Rez. RR Demonstration recognizes that challenge pretty well. It is one school. There are many others: BIA, or Apache, Navajo, or Coconino county schools. Results are not heartening, IMO.

    So, yes, people are trying. Are they all succeeding? IMO, probably not.
    [/opinion]
     
  12. Jun 19, 2017 #11

    StatGuy2000

    User Avatar
    Education Advisor

    If that is the case, in your opinion, are there any prospects for the survival of minority languages (Native American languages in particular) in the United States? Or will all minority languages (beyond those spoken by recent immigrants) die out and everyone in the US will become monolingual in English only?
     
  13. Jun 19, 2017 #12

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Well, Spanish (and English) is an official language for all transactions in New Mexico. The state constitution dictates this.
    So, the English-only movement, like you see in Arizona, doesn't get much traction here. How social media and TV/radio will affect this in years to come, I do not know.

    But the status quo is codified, so to speak. Language is inherently dynamic, so changes will occur, regardless of the state laws.
     
  14. Jun 20, 2017 #13
    Thanks for participating Jim!
     
  15. Jul 4, 2017 #14

    john baez

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This interview has some really wretched line breaks. I believe the technology underlying PhysicsForums requires that you not include carriage returns within a paragraph, if you want to prevent that.
     
  16. Jul 4, 2017 #15

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    'Guns, Germs, and Steel' is an excellent book and I have a copy of it.

    While I really enjoyed all the "sciency" stuff in the book, my favorite passage was where Jarad Diamond was explaining that the Aztecs had never seen horses (or any other large land animal) before and must have been absolutely terrified when men mounted on these huge beasts charged them during their fights with the spaniards. I don't know why, but it really stuck with me. I guess because it made me think of something I'd never thought about before. I mean, who nowadays hasn't seen a horse before? Even if only in pictures. I'd be terrified if someone on a horse charged me too, but at least I already know what a horse is!
     
  17. Jul 4, 2017 #16
    Fixed, thanks!
     
  18. Jul 4, 2017 #17

    OCR

    User Avatar

    Much better.... :thumbup:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Interview with Biologist Jim McNamara - Comments
Loading...