Atomic Radius of H & He: Why is H Larger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rade2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Radius
Rade2
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Question, sorry if it already answered:

See this link:
http://www.wacklepedia.com/h/hy/hydrogen.html

Question is, why is calculated atomic radius of hydrogen (53 pm) LARGER than calculated radius of helium (31 pm) ? How can a single proton have larger radius than helium which has two proton ?

Also, why nobody yet measure the atomic radius of helium, why it still only 'calculated'--seems like a Ph.D. dissertation project that should have been done years ago ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first, the size of the nucleus has almost zero impact on the "size" of the atom, which is due to the number of electrons.

Second, as I explained recently in this post in a thread farther down, the exact 'radius' of an atom is a notoriously difficult to define concept. They're not tiny hard spheres!

The answer to why helium is smaller is that both of helium's electrons are in the same orbital as the single electron of hydrogen (the 1s orbital), so it's radius does not expand much from having the second electron. However, the doubled nuclear charge causes both electrons to move closer to the nucleus.

Here's what the radial charge distribution looks like for hydrogen: (in units of Bohr radiuses)

And for helium (same scale):
29p6iox.png


As you can see, it's very nearly the same curve, only the helium one has been 'compressed', radially.

Both of these curves are calculated (the helium compares some approximate methods to the exact value). The reason why the values are calculated is simple: Atomic radii can be calculated much more exactly than they can be measured.

The radius of atoms only really increases substantially when you start a new shell, e.g. the next step, lithium, is quite dramatic. Which is why most metal atoms (d-orbital elements) have about the same radius. And can therefore mix with each other in crystals and form alloys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Note in the first plot above that the radial wave function for a hydrogen-like atom is of the form
e-2Zr/a0
where a0 is a fundamental constant = Bohr radius = 529 pm. So the "Bohr radius" of an atom of charge Z is 539/Z p m.
The Bohr radius = 1372 times the classical electron radius re.
 
Thanks very much for the detailed reply.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top