Attempting to find an equation, not sure how to present it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimablah
  • Start date Start date
ultimablah
Hey, all! I haven't been here for a long time, but I've got a problem I'm working on, and I'm not quite sure how to present my equation.

My problem is, for any given random event P with 1/D chance of occurring, what is the probability L, given T attempts, of event P occurring at least once?

The probability of P occurring when T is one is obvious, just 1/D, but past that, it seems to get rather complicated.

For D = 2, 3, and 4, the chances are charted below:

Code:
D=2
T | L
1 | 1/2
2 | 3/4
3 | 7/8
4 | 15/16
5 | 31/32

D = 3
T | L
1 | 1/3
2 | 5/9
3 | 19/27
4 | 65/81
5 | 211/243

D = 4
T | L
1 | 1/4
2 | 7/16
3 | 37/64
4 | 175/256
5 | 781/1024

Now, I've figured an equation which works for solving for any L in terms of T, but the problem is that it requires the numerator of the previous L, and I don't want to have to get to T = 5 by solving 4, 3, 2, and 1 each time. I'd like an equation that solves for L given only T and D. What's it called if my equation requires a previous result to determine the next result?

I think I put the equation down correctly, please tell me it makes sense.L(T) = \frac{N_T}{D_T} = \frac{(D-1)*(N_{T-1})+D^{T-1}}{D^{T}}
Did I explain everything all right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ultimablah said:
My problem is, for any given random event P with 1/D chance of occurring, what is the probability L, given T attempts, of event P occurring at least once?

Probability P occurs (1 try): 1/D
Probability P does not occur (1 try): 1 - 1/D
Probability P does not occur (T tries): (1 - 1/D)^T
Probability P occurs at least once (T tries): 1 - (1 - 1/D)^T
 
Thank you, but now I have another problem.

Let's say we had five marbles, 2 green and 3 red.

What are the chances, if you draw two marbles without replacing any, of getting at least one green?

That equation wouldn't work here, because N/D changes/
 
Try working out some small examples. The formula should make itself obvious.

You'll probably use the factorial in the formula.
 
Use the same logic as CRGreathouse showed you for the first problem: the probability of getting "at least one green" is 1- the probability of getting no green- i.e. the probability of getting two red.

Initially there are 2 green and 3 red: 5 altogether so the probability of getting RED is __

Assuming red is drawn (which you must in order to get "2 red") there are 2 green and 2 red left: 4 altogether, so the probability of getting RED is ____.

The probability of getting both red is the product of those two.

The probability of getting "at least one green" is 1 minus that.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top