"Attraction Force x Energy Accumulation" clarification

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravitational attraction, energy conversion, and the implications of tidal forces between the Earth and the Moon. Participants explore concepts related to energy conservation, tidal energy generation, and the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the conversion of tidal energy to electrical energy implies that energy can be created, given that the gravitational attraction between the Earth and Moon remains constant.
  • Another participant notes that the Moon will gradually move away from the Earth due to tidal effects, suggesting that energy is dissipated over time, which may reduce the energy of the Earth-Moon system.
  • A participant mentions that the torque exerted by the Moon on the Earth slows the Earth's rotation, potentially leading to tidal locking, which would eventually eliminate tides and tidal energy harvesting.
  • There is a correction regarding the direction of the Moon's movement, with one participant clarifying that the Moon is moving further away from the Earth, not closer, due to the transfer of angular momentum.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while energy is transferred from the Earth to the Moon, the total energy of the Earth-Moon system remains constant, and the attractive force of gravity does not change in this context.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the tidal locking process and the reasons behind the Moon's increasing distance from the Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of energy conversion and the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system. There is no consensus on whether energy can be created from the gravitational attraction, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the long-term effects of tidal forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various aspects of energy conservation, tidal forces, and gravitational interactions, but there are limitations in the assumptions made about energy transfer and the implications of tidal locking.

Shiki
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
First of all, I did not major in Physics, but I did pass GCE with A. (This is to make a point, not to boast.)

But there's a matter that doesn't make any sense to me, and none of my acquaintances could give me the clarification so I came to this forum, hoping someone can make me understand this.

[Please move this thread to the necessary section, if I posted it in a wrong section. Thanks in advance.]
-----------------------------------
"Energy can neither be created nor destroyed."

"A force of an attraction exists between any two objects that have mass. The more mass they have, the greater the force of attraction. The closer they are, the greater the force of attraction."

The problem is...

Let's say, there's an Earth and a moon.

The attraction force between them won't disappear any time soon, and so it will remain constant.

However, the gravitational energy of moon acts on the tidal waves...

Gravitational energy => Tidal energy

The tidal energy is then converted to mechanical energy, which is converted to electrical energy.

Tidal Energy => Mechanical Energy => Electrical Energy

So in the end, we get an electrical energy.

However, we move that electrical energy to another planet, which is not the Earth (or moon).

We repeat this process multiple times.

However, the attraction force between the Earth and Moon will still remain constant.

And, we will always be able to convert the electrical energy from it.

The energy source will never be depleted.

Doesn't this mean that the energy can be created over the time?

Or, am I wrong? Can anyone help me clarify it? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
The moon will gradually move closer to the Earth due to this effect. Energy is dissipated over time so the energy of the earth/moon system must reduce.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki
If memory serves me the torque exerted by the moon on the Earth due to tidal effects slows the period of Earth's rotation on the order of magnitude of about 1 millisecond per century. Eventually the Earth will be tidally locked to the moon and there will be no tides (assuming the sun hasn't gone red giant yet). Hence there will be no tidal energy to harvest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki and Jilang
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki
Sorry, yes I was just thinking about the gravitational energy. There is also kinetic energy too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki
I see. Thank you for the very quick replies. o.o

Even counting the sun's attraction force, it is possible for the Earth to be tidally locked?

And, can you explain why it would "move further away" and not "closer"?
 
Shiki said:
We repeat this process multiple times.

However, the attraction force between the Earth and Moon will still remain constant.

And, we will always be able to convert the electrical energy from it.

The energy source will never be depleted.

The Moon is gradually moving away from the Earth as the tides transfer angular momentum from the Earth to the Moon, which increases its orbital angular momentum. This increase in orbital angular momentum manifests as an increase in the Moon's orbital radius over time. The transfer of angular momentum slows the rotation of the Earth down, which reduces its rotational energy. No energy is lost and the total energy of the Earth-Moon system remains the same.

If you use the tides to generate energy, less energy is transferred to the Moon, but the Earth still slows down.

Also, this isn't about the attractive force of gravity changing. Fundamental forces do not use energy, they create it. That's why work (energy is the ability to perform work) is defined as a force applied over a distance, or W=F x D. So a book on your table has a constant force applied to it through the Earth's gravity, but no work is done on it and hence no energy is used or lost since it isn't moving. If the book then falls off the table to the floor, gravitational potential energy is first transformed into kinetic energy as the book accelerates and then into heat and sound when the book hits the floor. The book is now in a lower energy state than it was before falling.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki
Shiki said:
And, can you explain why it would "move further away" and not "closer"?

The Earth rotates faster than the Moon orbits, so the bulges produced by the Moon's gravity are rotated forwards. The closer bulge pulls the Moon forward in its orbit more than the further bulge pulls it backwards (because the closer bulge has more attraction by virtue of being closer). This accelerates the Moon, which drives its orbit outwards. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration

220px-Tidal_braking.svg.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shiki
Wow, thank you very much.

I'm very glad for the answers. I'm bookmarking this link. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 236 ·
8
Replies
236
Views
12K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K