Atwood machine calculation for launching a pebble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of acceleration and forces in an Atwood machine involving two masses (m1 and m2) and an additional mass (m). The derived acceleration formula is a = g(m + m2 - m1) / (m + m1 + m2), which was compared to the answer in "Physics for Scientists & Engineers" by Tipler & Mosca. Participants confirmed the correctness of the derived equations and emphasized the importance of understanding the weight difference driving acceleration, while also clarifying Newton's third law in the context of normal forces and gravitational forces acting on the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Atwood machine mechanics
  • Ability to construct free-body diagrams
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of acceleration in Atwood machines using different mass configurations
  • Learn about free-body diagram construction for complex systems
  • Explore Newton's third law in various physical contexts
  • Investigate common mistakes in Atwood machine problems and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Atwood machines and related force calculations.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Homework Statement
Massless pulley . massless string with block of mass m1 at one end . block of mass m2 at other end. If pebble of mass m is placed on block of mass m2 , what is the force exerted by the pebble om block of mass 2 ?
Relevant Equations
Newton's 2nd law ; F=ma
Assume m2>m1 and take positive direction as downwards. String is inextensible so acceleration of block up = acceleration of block +pebble down =a
I used the following 2 equations to obtain a ;
-m1a = m1g - T , (m2+m)a = (m+m2)g - T
which gives a = g(m+m2-m1)/(m+m1+m2)

I then constructed a free-body diagram for the pebble which has its weight acting down and the normal reaction from the block acting upward.
Using ma= mg - N ; i arrived at N = 2m1mg/(m+m1+m2
I then said that the force exerted by pebble on m2 is equal and opposite to the normal reaction , N

Where am i going wrong ? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
Hi,
The answer given in Physics for Scientists & Engineers by Tipler & Mosca is g( m2 + m12 + m22) / (m+m1 + m2 )

I have no confidence in my answer because Atwood's machine questions totally confuse me
 
Consider the limiting case where ##m_1 \to 0##. Then ##m## and ##m_2## would be in free fall, and the masses would not exert a force on each other. Your answer gives that result; the one from the book doesn't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn, Steve4Physics and Lnewqban
dyn said:
I have no confidence in my answer because Atwood's machine questions totally confuse me

(Edited to correct typo'.)

Hi. I agree with your final answer and, as Vela observed (#4), the book-answer can't be correct.

Many students find Atwood machine calculations confusing. I think it's because there are 2 different directions of acceleration and errors with signs creep in.

One ‘trick’ that might help you for simple problems is to note that it is the difference in weights which drives the acceleration.

For a simple example I’ll use |g| = 10m/s². Say the masses are 1kg (weight = 10N) and 3kg (weight = 30N). The weight difference is 30N – 10N = 20N
.
***We have 20N accelerating a mass of 4kg as if we had a simple 1D arrangement.***
$$|a| = \frac{|F_{net}|}{m_{total}} = \frac{20}{1+3} = 5m/s^2 $$We didn’t even need to write equations involving tension (an internal force)!

For the smaller mass alone, tension is greater than weight, so the accelerating force is |T| - 10 upwards
|F| = m|a| gives |T| -10 = 1*5 .

For the larger mass alone, weight is greater than tension, so the accelerating force is 30 - |T| downwards.
|F| = m|a| gives 30 - |T| = 3*5.

In your problem (using your assumption that m₂+m> m₁) the weight difference is (m₂g + mg) – m₁g and the total mass is m₁ + m₂ + m. So we can immedately write:
$$|a| = \frac{|g|(m_2 +m – m_1)}{m_1 + m_2 + m} $$

Note we are taking each object's positive direction to be the direction of its acceleration. So when we look at the pebble (accelerating down) we know the net force is m|g|- N, giving m|g|- N = m|a|
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn
dyn said:
I then constructed a free-body diagram for the pebble which has its weight acting down and the normal reaction from the block acting upward.
Using ma= mg - N ; i arrived at N = 2m1mg/(m+m1+m2
I then said that the force exerted by pebble on m2 is equal and opposite to the normal reaction , N

Where am i going wrong ? Thanks
Thanks for your help everyone. Can i just check one last thing ? The normal reaction from the block acting upward on the pebble which is numerically equal ( due to Newton's 3rd Law ) to to the force exerted by the pebble on the block. Are these 2 forces an example of an action-reaction pair ? The other relevant action-reaction pair being the gravitational force downwards on the block and pebble and the gravitational force upwards on the Earth due to the mass of the block and pebble. Is that all correct ?
 
dyn said:
Thanks for your help everyone. Can i just check one last thing ? The normal reaction from the block acting upward on the pebble which is numerically equal ( due to Newton's 3rd Law ) to to the force exerted by the pebble on the block. Are these 2 forces an example of an action-reaction pair ? The other relevant action-reaction pair being the gravitational force downwards on the block and pebble and the gravitational force upwards on the Earth due to the mass of the block and pebble. Is that all correct ?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn
I'm going to post a related question in the Classical Physics forum if anyone is interested
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K