Average acceleration and total acceleration of gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a smaller mass to fall to the surface of a larger spherical mass under gravitational influence, where the acceleration is not constant. The gravitational force is expressed as F = GMm/r², leading to a differential equation for the motion of the smaller mass. The participants suggest using integration techniques to derive the time function t(r) and emphasize that the average force over distance does not equate to average acceleration. Instead, they recommend calculating work through integration to find the necessary parameters. The conversation highlights the complexity of solving the problem and the importance of understanding the underlying physics.
Nick Heller
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Say you have a gravitational acceleration between a spherical object of mass M and inner radius R and a much smaller spherical object of mass m (essentially point-like) and distance ro away (M >> m) with an acceleration on mass m at any point r given by
a = GM/r2
Knowing that the acceleration with respect to the distance between the two objects is not constant, how would you calculate the amount of time it would take for the object to hit the surface of the larger sphere (also assuming the larger sphere moves negligibly)? The smaller object moves from a distance ro away from the center of mass of the larger object (r = 0) to a distance R away from this center.
Solving this as a differential equation has gotten hairy. My other approach was to take the average force with respect to the distance from the center given by (the definite integral from ro to R of Fdr)/(R - ro) where F is the standard gravitational force. This comes from the equation for the average of any function. Once this average force is calculated, the acceleration is constant, so can it be inserted into the regular kinematic constant-acceleration equations to find the amount of time it would take to transverse the distance?
I am not a physicist (yet), so be merciful. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Nick, welcome to PF :smile: !

Not sure what you mean with "I am not a physicist (yet)" -- but if you are going to be one, you should walk the walk and talk the talk. I.e. write out equations and then solve them. In your case something like $$\vec F = m\vec a$$ and if I understand you well, $$| \vec F | = {GM m\over r^2} $$ and you describe the free fall of an object with mass m that is let go from a distance ##r_0## above M and you want to describe ##|r|## as a function of time. So you get an equation like $${d^2r\over dt^2} = -{A\over r^2}$$with ##r(t=0) = r_0##. Am I right so far ?

--
 
Yes, right so far
 
Nick Heller said:
how would you calculate the amount of time it would take for the object to hit the surface of the larger sphere (also assuming the larger sphere moves negligibly)?
You cannot find a closed form solution for a function ##r(t)##, but you can find ##t(r)##.
First, observe that ## a= v \frac{dv}{dx}##
Now assume that ##dx=-dr## (i.e. only the displacement of the smaller mass leads to a reduction in the radial distance between the two masses), so that ## \int v dv = \frac{v^2}{2} = \int_{r_0}^r - \frac{GM}{r^2} dr## where ##r_0## is the radial distance of the smaller mass from the larger mass at t=0.
You can then calculate t by substituting ##v=\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{-dr}{dt}##, and rearranging the differentials so that $$ t = \int_{r_0}^{r} \frac{-dr}{\sqrt{2 \int_{r_0}^r - \frac{GM}{r^2} dr}}$$
You can then just substitute ##r=R## into the final expression you get to calculate the time the smaller mass takes to fall that radial distance. (Remember to compute the definite integral in the denominator first.)
 
Nick Heller said:
Yes, right so far
Solving the differential equation involves a couple of tricks that are not easy to spot.

You can also get the answer from Kepler's laws. But, again, the trick is not easy to spot.
 
By the way, the average of the force over distance will not give you the average acceleration.
You need the average over time.

You can use the average over distance to calculate the work, though. Which is the same as doing that integral.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top