B.A. or B.S. in Physics: Which is Better for Grad School in MS&E?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rulesby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    B.s. Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a B.A. or B.S. in Physics for graduate studies in Management Science and Engineering (MS&E). The key point is that the specific courses required for each degree vary by institution, making it difficult to determine which degree is inherently better for grad school applications. While a B.S. typically involves more upper-division physics courses, a B.A. may offer more flexibility for electives in chemistry and engineering, which could be beneficial for an interdisciplinary field like MS&E. Ultimately, the courses taken, rather than the degree title, are considered more important by graduate programs. The conversation emphasizes the need to review individual school requirements and course offerings when making this decision.
Rulesby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm an undergrad getting ready to transfer as a junior from a 2-year college to a 4-year college. My declared major is physics, but I want to go to grad school under an MS&E program. Should I go for a B.A. in physics? My reasoning is that it would allow me to take more chemistry and engineering electives.

What are benefits and the damages of each: B.A. Physics and B.S. Physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you live in the US? If so, you can take whatever courses you want, it doesn't really matter what your major is (outside of very specific courses for very specific majors... which I've only ever heard of 1 class being that way).
 
Rulesby said:
What are benefits and the damages of each: B.A. Physics and B.S. Physics?

It depends on the specific courses required for the two degrees. There's no standardization, especially between different schools. If one school offers only a B.A. and the other offers only a B.S., it's impossible to conclude just from the names of the degrees which one is "better."

Harvard offers only a B.A. Who would turn up his nose at a B.A. in physics from Harvard? :smile:
 
Pengwuino said:
Do you live in the US? If so, you can take whatever courses you want, it doesn't really matter what your major is (outside of very specific courses for very specific majors... which I've only ever heard of 1 class being that way).

Yeah, i live in the United States. I'm planing to transfer to the UC or CSU system. The way I've been taught how these colleges work in tandem with the California Community Colleges (which I am currently attending), is this. A person in a CCC must go on assist.org to make sure that you are taking courses which work toward his or her major. assist.org tell us what courses the universities expect a junior to have already completed. If I want to transfer as a junior and my declared major is physics, I need to have completed those courses outlined in assist.org.

AFAIK, I can't just take whatever courses I want. If I don't take the courses outlined in their physics program, they will not give me a physics degree.

The dilemma here is that if I got with a B.S. program in physics, I will be taking mostly upper division physics courses, leaving little room for electives. On the other hand, if I go with a B.A. program, I will not be required to take all of the upper division courses a B.S. major would have to do, which gives me space in my schedule to take chemistry and engineering courses.

The problem is that I don't know which of the two will make a better case for me when I apply to graduate school under an MS&E program. Will the grad school not care (overlook) if I took those extra electives to prepare myself for the interdisciplinary field of MS&E? Or maybe will they see I have a B.S. Physics and they will have me take those extra chemistry and engineering courses during grad school?

jtbell said:
It depends on the specific courses required for the two degrees. There's no standardization, especially between different schools. If one school offers only a B.A. and the other offers only a B.S., it's impossible to conclude just from the names of the degrees which one is "better."

Harvard offers only a B.A. Who would turn up his nose at a B.A. in physics from Harvard? :smile:

What about schools that offer both a B.S. and a B.A.? The schools I am applying to do this. Would a grad school prefer a person applying to MS&E that has a B.S. or a B.A.?
 
MS&E = Materials Science and Engineering?
MS&E = Management Science and Engineering?

I found both kinds of programs on Googling for "MS&E".

Regardless, I still think what counts is the courses that you actually take, rather than the name of the degree per se (BA versus BS). What are the course requirements for a BA versus a BS, at whatever school you're interested in?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top