Bad Math Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter benorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
447 replies · 49K views
In fact, it turns out that the set of all infinities [having different cardinalities] is an infinite set. But until just recently we didn't know the cardinality of the set of all infinities. Someone finally came up with a proof that it is the one we all know and love - countable infinity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jbriggs444 said:
Are you sure? Sounds like a proper class to me. As stackexchange confirms.
Hmmm, that is what I read in something respectable [not sure exactly what now but probably Scientific American]. Maybe the proof was later found to be flawed. I thought it was a done deal.
 
loving women ia.png

loving women ib.png
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Care
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, pinball1970, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
Forget all those women, I am still trying to understand how to interpolate, or read a log scale that changes by a factor of 100 per cycle. 1, 4, 9, 16 ... 100.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, pinball1970, DaveC426913 and 1 other person
Baluncore said:
Forget all those women, I am still trying to understand how to interpolate, or read a log scale that changes by a factor of 100 per cycle. 1, 4, 9, 16 ... 100.
I knew someone would catch that...
 
Baluncore said:
Forget all those women, I am still trying to understand how to interpolate, or read a log scale that changes by a factor of 100 per cycle. 1, 4, 9, 16 ... 100.
If I'm not mistaken, since there are 9 lines per decade, and each decade increases by 100, the number corresponding to each line is [itex]100^{\frac{1}{9}} \approx 1.668101[/itex] multiplied by the previous line's corresponding number.

1.000000
1.668101
2.782559
4.641589
7.742637
12.91550
21.54435
35.93814
59.94843

100.0000
166.8101
278.2559
464.1589
774.2637
1291.550
2154.435
3593.814
5994.843

and so on.

(Edit: Nevermind. This would be the case if the lines on the chart were equally space. But they're not.)
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
If I'm not mistaken, since there are 9 lines per decade, and each decade increases by 100, the number corresponding to each line is [itex]100^{\frac{1}{9}} \approx 1.668101[/itex] multiplied by the previous line's corresponding number.

1.000000
1.668101
....
That not how log scales work.

The axis numbers still increase arithmetically within each "decade", in this case by an increment of ##\frac{100-1}{10-1} = 11##, so

1, 12, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67, 78, 89, 100.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
I considered whether it would be better to use the log grid correctly, but I decided it would have made it less readable.

Turns out, the only readers who are into this kind of humour are also very particular about getting the math correct.

Someone else wondered why - since it's a linear function - it was rendered as logarthymic at all.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
pinball1970 said:
I thought he was going to rescue everyone, that's no fun though!
Thought the objective was to get everyone killed in the least amount of effort :cool:
 
to more understandable math jokes............

A king and his castle is surrounded by 2 armies, and it is a stalemate, as the kings army is just as large as the other two. Still being seiged and all that is not pleasant.
His squire, an ingenious fellow, says that he will dual with the other squires for dominance.
The other two kings, and two squires snicker, as they see conquest. It is now definitely two against one.
The game is afoot.
The king's squire gets a pot, mixes oil and a goat's intestines, and a bunch of other stuff, cooks it over a raging flame to make a thick soup oozing over the top.
He flings a rope over a tree branch and hoists the pot in the air.

The other two armies seeing that are aghast.
They have no chance of winning the challenge. They pack up and retreat to their lands.

After all.
A squire of the high pot'n'ooze is equal the sum of the other two squires.

Ha ha - from a sci fi space movie, from a guy joking just before they are attacked.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, docnet, Grelbr42 and 3 others
Some group theorist had a lecture where he wrote down a new group and named it after an audience member: TED talk, at 16:30.
"That's your new symmetrical object, you are now immortal."

The speaker had no idea who she was. Andrea Ghez won the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and jack action
Haven't read yet any ' yo mamma' jokes you can always make up: Yo momma so ugly, she does not retract to a CW-Complex through a Simplicial Map.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and mathwonk
mfb said:
Never ask a mathematician to rate something. They think 6 is perfect.
Always get a Sr. Engineer to tell the rookies what is perfection. ( Release it at 90% of the "nice to haves" in 50% of the time)

Good specs and good design that meet spec, even if it has flaws that could be done better. That's a 10. If not revise the spec.

Tweaks come with Revisions under the guise of "Cost Reductions" Rated a 10 Rev A

But as an engineer, I never knew 6 was perfect. Imagine all the time I wasted trying to be 10.

Oddly enuf, all the consecutive perfect number divisors including itself follow Mr. Fibbonachi's sequence.
 
Last edited: