Balancing Oxidation-Reduction Reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dove99x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing oxidation-reduction reactions and identifying the oxidizing and reducing agents. It outlines the rules for oxidation and reduction, noting that reduction involves gaining electrons and losing oxygen, while oxidation involves losing electrons and gaining oxygen. An initial attempt to balance the equations is presented, but the author realizes their approach is incorrect. The correct balanced equation is provided from a textbook, highlighting the need for proper balancing of oxygen. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying agents in redox reactions.
Dove99x
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Complete and balance the following equations, and identify the oxidizing and reducing agents:

OXIDATION.png
2. Rules.

1) an element that is reduced Gains electrons and loses Oxygen

2) an element that is oxidized loses electrons but gains Oxygen

3. My attempt

Oxidizing Agent: 5e + 8H + MnO4 ^(1-) ---> Mn ^(2+) + 4H2O

Reducing Agent: 2H2O + CH4O ---> H2CO2 + 6H ^(1+) + 6e
--------------------------------------------------------------------


At this point I relize that what I'm doing is totally wrong. I don't know how to solve this.

4. Correct Answer from Book:

4MnO4 ^(1-) + 5 CH3OH + 12 H ^(1+) ---> 4Mn ^(2+) + 5HCO2H + 12 H2O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dove99x said:
Oxidizing Agent: 5e + 8H + MnO4 ^(1-) ---> Mn ^(2+) + 4H2O

Correct.

Reducing Agent: 2H2O + CH4O ---> H2CO2 + 6H ^(1+) + 6e

Oxygen is not balanced.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top