Ball floating on the surface of water
Click For Summary
Homework Help Overview
The discussion revolves around the behavior of a cork ball floating on the surface of water, particularly when atmospheric pressure is removed. Participants explore the implications of buoyancy and the forces acting on the ball in different scenarios, including the effects of air pressure and water displacement.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking
Approaches and Questions Raised
- Participants question whether atmospheric pressure truly affects the buoyancy of the cork ball and discuss the net forces acting on the ball when partially submerged. There are comparisons made to other objects, such as a concrete ball and cylinders, to clarify the concepts of buoyancy and pressure.
Discussion Status
The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the role of atmospheric pressure and buoyant forces. Some participants suggest thought experiments and analogies to deepen understanding, while others express uncertainty about the implications of removing air pressure.
Contextual Notes
There are ongoing debates about the assumptions made regarding air pressure and its uniformity, as well as the treatment of air as a buoyant medium. Participants are encouraged to consider different scenarios and their effects on buoyancy without reaching a definitive conclusion.
- 16,219
- 4,934
- 848
- 102
BvU said:Is the atmosphere really pressing down ?
Suppose 1/4th part of the ball is out of water , then the net force exerted by the air surrounding the ball will be downwards . No ?
- 16,219
- 4,934
- 848
- 102
BvU said:Compare with a concrete ball under water. Is the water pressing down or up ? (Archimedes had something sensible to say about this)
If the ball is completely under water ( water surrounding it from all sides ) then net force exerted by water on ball will be upwards . But in this case only a part of the ball is exposed to air .If a small part is exposed to air , net force exerted by air will be downwards . Although net force exerted by water will always be upwards .
- 16,219
- 4,934
After all, you already know that b) is not the right answer. Process of elimination of unlikely answers leads you to ...
But then: how to explain that ?
(*)
Perhaps a thought experiment with a much heavier gas than air
- 848
- 102
BvU said:Is the atmosphere really pressing down ?
I mean that force exerted by air will be radially inwards ( towards the center of the ball) at each part, but if we calculate the net force then that force will be vertically downwards . Is this incorrect ?
- 16,219
- 4,934
I repeat: think Archmedes.

- 848
- 102
BvU said:Think like Archimedes a little more ...
OK . Let me wear my Archimedes hat
Since air is eliminated effect of atmospheric pressure is eliminated from all sides . The net upthrust is the weight of volume of water displaced . This remains same . Should that be option c) remains unchanged ?
- 16,219
- 4,934
The incarnation I was phishing for has to do with
(I think that should be: 'is equal to')
From there it's a small step to the right answer (not c)

- 848
- 102
BvU said:From there it's a small step to the right answer (not c)
I don't think so
I think it should be c) .
For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
- 15,536
- 1,917
I think you are right.Jahnavi said:I don't think so
I think it should be c) .
For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
"net upward buoyant force which depends only on the
Edit: I am wrong, I forgot the buoyant force of air
- 5,995
- 3,135
@Jahnavi This is an important clue that @BvU has provided. An example: How is it possible that a hot air balloon or a helium balloon "floats"? Does Archimedes principle apply to a helium or hot air balloon? And would a helium balloon float on the moon, which has very little, essentially almost no atmosphere? ## \\ ## One additional hint: Assume the cork is a very low density cork. Work the problem from that perspective.BvU said:Perhaps a thought experiment with a much heavier gas than air?
- 848
- 102
Here is the key issue .
Do you agree that if we consider a cylinder partially submerged in water , the net buoyant force does not include weight of volume of air displaced by the cylinder AND instead if we consider a cylinder completely submerged in a container containing two different liquids such that part of cylinder lies in one liquid and part in other , buoyant force includes volume of both the liquids displaced by the cylinder ?
- 5,995
- 3,135
- 848
- 102
Charles Link said:The air by Archimedes principle can in fact be treated as a "liquid" that supplies a buoyant force
OK . Why doesn't then volume of air displaced by object appear in buoyant force ?
- 16,219
- 4,934
- 42,883
- 10,519
You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform. It's a subtle point, but it explains why BvU's argument leads to a different answer.Jahnavi said:I don't think so
I think it should be c) .
For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
But I'm not sure what cork ball will do in a vacuum. Lose air while staying the same shape, blow up like a balloon, explode, or...?
- 16,219
- 4,934
Wrong. This exercise is a bit more subtle. The pressure in the air part is being changed -- you can not ignore ##\rho_{\rm air} g h_{\rm air}##Jahnavi said:The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg .

- 5,995
- 3,135
See also the Editing: comment in post 15. In many cases, the buoyant force of the atmosphere is negligible. Archimedes principle is generally quite universal, and also applies to air, even though Archimedes didn't state it that way. ## \\ ## Additional item is Archimedes principle should really more accurately read the "effective volume displaced"=the volume below the water-line. Because it is possible to float a small boat weighing 10 pounds (shaped like the tub but just sightly smaller) in a tub of water using only one pound of water. The "effective" volume of water displaced is 10 pounds for this case, even though you actually have only one pound of water.Jahnavi said:OK . Why doesn't then volume of air displaced by object appear in buoyant force ?
- 16,219
- 4,934

- 848
- 102
BvU said:Excess noise from too much help. I withdraw.![]()
It might seem noise to you , but it is actually helping me understand things
Don't withdraw !
- 848
- 102
haruspex said:You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform.
Excellent point
We generally assume atmospheric pressure is uniform .Don't we ?
Assuming air pressure is uniform ,
Consider a cylinder partially submerged in water with length 'l' . The pressure at the top circular surface is PO . Force is POA . Pressure at the bottom is PO+lρg .
Net Buoyant force = [PO+lρg]A -
POA = lρgA = Vρg
V is volume of water displaced by the cylinder . So , volume of air doesn't come in picture . This is due to the assumption that atmospheric pressure is constant .
This leads to the question - Why can't we assume atmospheric pressure constant ?
@BvU , @haruspex , @Charles Link please tell what do you think ?
Note : I agree that if we consider air pressure non uniform , volume of air does play a role in buoyant force .
- 5,995
- 3,135
The buoyant force from any liquid or gas is indeed a result of a pressure gradient that occurs. In any case, in computing the buoyant force, all that is necessary is to apply Archimedes principle, and to compute the weight of the displaced liquid or gas to get the buoyant force. ## \\ ## The statement of Archimedes principle can be derived by assuming equilibrium between the force per unit volume ## f_p=-\nabla P ## pressure gradient force, and the gravitational force per unit volume ## f_g=\delta g ##. With a vector calculus identity involving the integral of the pressure gradient over a volume (I believe it is a form of Gauss' law), the statement of Archimedes principle follows. ## \\ ## @Jahnavi To respond to your latest post: The details just presented shows a microscopic pressure difference with height in the air necessarily occurs, but all you need to do is consider the air at a fixed pressure and compute the weight of the air displaced to compute the buoyant force from the air.haruspex said:You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform. It's a subtle point, but it explains why BvU's argument leads to a different answer.
But I'm not sure what cork ball will do in a vacuum. Lose air while staying the same shape, blow up like a balloon, explode, or...?
- 16,219
- 4,934
- 848
- 102
Assuming air pressure is non uniform ,
Initially , buoyant force = Vair ρairg + Vwater ρwaterg .
When air is removed , buoyant force = Vwater ρwaterg .
Since this buoyant force has to balance the weight of the ball , volume of water displaced by ball in latter case is more . Hence the ball sinks a little i.e option a) .
- 16,219
- 4,934
Note: Archi principle takes all this nonuniformity into account. Pretty neat !- 848
- 102
- 16,219
- 4,934
- 848
- 102
Similar threads
- · Replies 6 ·
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 19 ·
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 11 ·
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 22 ·
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 4K