Ball floating on the surface of water

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a cork ball floating on the surface of water, particularly when atmospheric pressure is removed. Participants explore the implications of buoyancy and the forces acting on the ball in different scenarios, including the effects of air pressure and water displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether atmospheric pressure truly affects the buoyancy of the cork ball and discuss the net forces acting on the ball when partially submerged. There are comparisons made to other objects, such as a concrete ball and cylinders, to clarify the concepts of buoyancy and pressure.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the role of atmospheric pressure and buoyant forces. Some participants suggest thought experiments and analogies to deepen understanding, while others express uncertainty about the implications of removing air pressure.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the assumptions made regarding air pressure and its uniformity, as well as the treatment of air as a buoyant medium. Participants are encouraged to consider different scenarios and their effects on buoyancy without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


question.PNG


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



When air is evacuated , atmospheric pressure pushing down the cork is eliminated , cork should rise a little i.e option b) . This is incorrect .

What am I missing ?
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,240
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the atmosphere really pressing down ?
 
BvU said:
Is the atmosphere really pressing down ?

Suppose 1/4th part of the ball is out of water , then the net force exerted by the air surrounding the ball will be downwards . No ?
 
Compare with a concrete ball under water. Is the water pressing down or up ? (Archimedes had something sensible to say about this)
 
BvU said:
Compare with a concrete ball under water. Is the water pressing down or up ? (Archimedes had something sensible to say about this)

If the ball is completely under water ( water surrounding it from all sides ) then net force exerted by water on ball will be upwards . But in this case only a part of the ball is exposed to air .If a small part is exposed to air , net force exerted by air will be downwards . Although net force exerted by water will always be upwards .
 
Think like Archimedes a little more ... :wink: (*)

After all, you already know that b) is not the right answer. Process of elimination of unlikely answers leads you to ... :rolleyes: the right answer.

But then: how to explain that ?

(*)
Perhaps a thought experiment with a much heavier gas than air o_O ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
BvU said:
Is the atmosphere really pressing down ?

I mean that force exerted by air will be radially inwards ( towards the center of the ball) at each part, but if we calculate the net force then that force will be vertically downwards . Is this incorrect ?
 
Yes. :frown:

I repeat: think Archmedes. :woot:
 
BvU said:
Think like Archimedes a little more ...

OK . Let me wear my Archimedes hat :cool: .

Since air is eliminated effect of atmospheric pressure is eliminated from all sides . The net upthrust is the weight of volume of water displaced . This remains same . Should that be option c) remains unchanged ?
 
  • #11
BvU said:
From there it's a small step to the right answer (not c)

I don't think so :smile:

I think it should be c) .

For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
 
  • #12
Jahnavi said:
I don't think so :smile:

I think it should be c) .

For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
I think you are right.
"net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length volume of cylinder submerged"
Edit: I am wrong, I forgot the buoyant force of air
 
Last edited:
  • #13
BvU said:
Perhaps a thought experiment with a much heavier gas than air o_O ?
@Jahnavi This is an important clue that @BvU has provided. An example: How is it possible that a hot air balloon or a helium balloon "floats"? Does Archimedes principle apply to a helium or hot air balloon? And would a helium balloon float on the moon, which has very little, essentially almost no atmosphere? ## \\ ## One additional hint: Assume the cork is a very low density cork. Work the problem from that perspective.
 
  • #14
Hi Charles ,

Here is the key issue .

Do you agree that if we consider a cylinder partially submerged in water , the net buoyant force does not include weight of volume of air displaced by the cylinder AND instead if we consider a cylinder completely submerged in a container containing two different liquids such that part of cylinder lies in one liquid and part in other , buoyant force includes volume of both the liquids displaced by the cylinder ?
 
  • #15
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #16
Charles Link said:
The air by Archimedes principle can in fact be treated as a "liquid" that supplies a buoyant force

OK . Why doesn't then volume of air displaced by object appear in buoyant force ?
 
  • #17
Weight of volume of air displaced = ##\rho\; g V ## with ##V## volume of object and ##\rho## density of fluid.
 
  • #18
Jahnavi said:
I don't think so :smile:

I think it should be c) .

For simplicity consider a cylinder instead of sphere partially submerged in water . The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg . When we do a force balance the effect of atmospheric pressure cancels leaving us with a net upward buoyant force which depends only on the length of cylinder submerged . This essentially tells us that amount of object submerged in water is independent of air pressure . Even if we increase the pressure inside jar , level of object submerged doesn't change .
You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform. It's a subtle point, but it explains why BvU's argument leads to a different answer.
But I'm not sure what cork ball will do in a vacuum. Lose air while staying the same shape, blow up like a balloon, explode, or...?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #19
Jahnavi said:
The pressure at the top is PO . Pressure at the bottom is PO+hρg .
Wrong. This exercise is a bit more subtle. The pressure in the air part is being changed -- you can not ignore ##\rho_{\rm air} g h_{\rm air}##

:nb)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #20
Jahnavi said:
OK . Why doesn't then volume of air displaced by object appear in buoyant force ?
See also the Editing: comment in post 15. In many cases, the buoyant force of the atmosphere is negligible. Archimedes principle is generally quite universal, and also applies to air, even though Archimedes didn't state it that way. ## \\ ## Additional item is Archimedes principle should really more accurately read the "effective volume displaced"=the volume below the water-line. Because it is possible to float a small boat weighing 10 pounds (shaped like the tub but just sightly smaller) in a tub of water using only one pound of water. The "effective" volume of water displaced is 10 pounds for this case, even though you actually have only one pound of water.
 
  • #21
Excess noise from too much help. I withdraw. :nb)
 
  • #22
BvU said:
Excess noise from too much help. I withdraw. :nb)

It might seem noise to you , but it is actually helping me understand things :smile: . I am thinking about your suggestions .

Don't withdraw !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #23
haruspex said:
You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform.

Excellent point :smile:

We generally assume atmospheric pressure is uniform .Don't we ?

Assuming air pressure is uniform ,

Consider a cylinder partially submerged in water with length 'l' . The pressure at the top circular surface is PO . Force is POA . Pressure at the bottom is PO+lρg .

Net Buoyant force = [PO+lρg]A -
POA = lρgA = Vρg

V is volume of water displaced by the cylinder . So , volume of air doesn't come in picture . This is due to the assumption that atmospheric pressure is constant .

This leads to the question - Why can't we assume atmospheric pressure constant ?

@BvU , @haruspex , @Charles Link please tell what do you think ?

Note : I agree that if we consider air pressure non uniform , volume of air does play a role in buoyant force .
 
  • #24
haruspex said:
You are overlooking that the air pressure will be not quite uniform. It's a subtle point, but it explains why BvU's argument leads to a different answer.
But I'm not sure what cork ball will do in a vacuum. Lose air while staying the same shape, blow up like a balloon, explode, or...?
The buoyant force from any liquid or gas is indeed a result of a pressure gradient that occurs. In any case, in computing the buoyant force, all that is necessary is to apply Archimedes principle, and to compute the weight of the displaced liquid or gas to get the buoyant force. ## \\ ## The statement of Archimedes principle can be derived by assuming equilibrium between the force per unit volume ## f_p=-\nabla P ## pressure gradient force, and the gravitational force per unit volume ## f_g=\delta g ##. With a vector calculus identity involving the integral of the pressure gradient over a volume (I believe it is a form of Gauss' law), the statement of Archimedes principle follows. ## \\ ## @Jahnavi To respond to your latest post: The details just presented shows a microscopic pressure difference with height in the air necessarily occurs, but all you need to do is consider the air at a fixed pressure and compute the weight of the air displaced to compute the buoyant force from the air.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
Charles Link said:
all that is necessary is to apply Archimedes principle
-a-big-smiley-face-gc4gtzb-big-smiley-traditional-cache-in-hong-kong-images-of-a-big-smiley-face.png
 

Attachments

  • -a-big-smiley-face-gc4gtzb-big-smiley-traditional-cache-in-hong-kong-images-of-a-big-smiley-face.png
    -a-big-smiley-face-gc4gtzb-big-smiley-traditional-cache-in-hong-kong-images-of-a-big-smiley-face.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 527
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #26
OK . Back to the original question :smile:

Assuming air pressure is non uniform ,

Initially , buoyant force = Vair ρairg + Vwater ρwaterg .

When air is removed , buoyant force = Vwater ρwaterg .

Since this buoyant force has to balance the weight of the ball , volume of water displaced by ball in latter case is more . Hence the ball sinks a little i.e option a) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #27
:partytime:Note: Archi principle takes all this nonuniformity into account. Pretty neat !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #28
I am glad everyone is happy especially @BvU :biggrin: .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and Charles Link
  • #29
Let's not turn PF into a mutual admiration society...
 
  • #30
But to spoil the fun , answer given is c) , which means that the question setter is assuming air pressure uniform .Isn't it ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K