Lifting a Man with 100m^3 of Helium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of lifting a human being using helium-filled balloons, focusing on the calculations of buoyancy based on the densities of air and helium. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical applications, and personal anecdotes related to the lifting power of helium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates that to lift a 100 kg person, approximately 83 m³ of air needs to be displaced, suggesting a helium-filled structure of 96 m³ could achieve a net lift of about 13 kg.
  • Another participant humorously references the common experience of helium balloons, implying that the concept is well-known.
  • A suggestion is made to refer to another thread for detailed calculations regarding buoyancy and the weight of displaced air.
  • Some participants question the accuracy of the stated densities of helium and air, suggesting that the helium density should be around 0.18 kg/m³ instead of the provided value.
  • A personal anecdote describes witnessing helium balloons lifting people at an event, emphasizing the impressive lifting power of helium compared to larger hot air balloons.
  • Another participant estimates that a light person would require about 44 m³ of helium to stay afloat, discussing the visual perspective of balloon size in relation to the environment.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the possibility of additional support mechanisms, such as propellers, that could assist in lifting.
  • A participant shares a photo that aligns with their calculations, suggesting that the combined weight of the person and balloon material could necessitate a helium volume of 100 m³ or more.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy of density values for helium and air, and there is no consensus on the calculations for lifting a person with helium. The discussion includes both anecdotal experiences and technical calculations, indicating a mix of agreement on the lifting potential of helium but disagreement on specific numerical values.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on the accuracy of the stated densities, which are contested. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the weight of balloon materials and the exact volume of helium required for different weights of individuals.

physicsforumsfan
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Reading about different ways to lift a human being, I've come to realize the easiest is simply manipulating density as follows:

Denisty of Air at STP: 1.20 kg/m^3
Density of He at STP: 0.000179 kg/m^3

Therefore for every cubic metre (m^3) of air displacement, lift achieved is ~1.2 kg/m^3 (deducting air density from helium density).

Thus to lift 100 kg person, one would need to displace: 100 kg/1.2 kg/m^3 = ~83 m^3 of air

Therefore if a material of negligible weight with dimensions of 4*4*6 metres (equalling 96 m^3) was filled with helium, a net upward lift of approximately 13 kg would be achieved.

Can anyone confirm this to be correct. If yes then what lightweight material could you use to make this?

Thanks everyone in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hum... you've never seen a helium balloon?

Zz.
 
Try looking at this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/helium-for-flying-buoyancy.866819/#post-5443653 particularly posts 6 and 12. ## \\ ## (Post 12 shows the details of the density of air calculation, using ## PV=nRT ##, which also gives the buoyancy per unit volume, (treating kilograms as "weight"), since that is the weight of the air that gets displaced ( the weight of the helium per unit volume needs to be subtracted along with any weight of the balloon material, to get the net buoyancy of the helium per unit volume)). ## \\ ## See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Walters ## \\ ## I wouldn't recommend doing this, but it is amusing. :)
 
Last edited:
physforums said:
Denisty of Air at STP: 1.20 kg/m^3
Density of He at STP: 0.000179 kg/m^3
One of those has to be incorrect. Helium has a molecular weight of 4. Air has a molecular weight of 28, give or take. The ratio should be roughly seven to one, not seven thousand to one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
jbriggs444 said:
One of those has to be incorrect. Helium has a molecular weight of 4. Air has a molecular weight of 28, give or take. The ratio should be roughly seven to one, not seven thousand to one.
The helium should be ## \delta_{He}=.18 ## kg/m^3.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Some years ago (I guess it must have been about 18) my wife and I went to the Millennium Dome in London (now the O2). In the dome, there was an impressive show of absolute nutters doing daring things, suspended from the top of the dome Also, there were young women (probably very light) and they were freely buzzing around slowly, over everyone's heads, supported in harnesses by surprisingly small helium filled balloons. The lifting power of He was really brought home to me and I couldn't help comparing those little balloons with the massive hot air balloons that are used to lift a few people in a basket.
I have done the sums and it's no real surprise - just impressive.
I looked all over for a photo on line, Couldn't find one.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Some years ago (I guess it must have been about 18) my wife and I went to the Millennium Dome in London (now the O2). In the dome, there was an impressive show of absolute nutters doing daring things, suspended from the top of the dome Also, there were young women (probably very light) and they were freely buzzing around slowly, over everyone's heads, supported in harnesses by surprisingly small helium filled balloons. The lifting power of He was really brought home to me and I couldn't help comparing those little balloons with the massive hot air balloons that are used to lift a few people in a basket.
I have done the sums and it's no real surprise - just impressive.
I looked all over for a photo on line, Couldn't find one.
It is possible they were also suspended with wires. A light 100 lb. person, (about 44 kg), would need about 44 m^3 of helium balloon volume to keep them afloat.
 
Charles Link said:
It is possible they were also suspended with wires. A light 100 lb. person, (about 44 kg), would need about 44 m^3 of helium balloon volume to keep them afloat.
Unlikely that they were suspended because they were very mobile and it would have been something I was looking for. But 44m3 would only require around 5m diameter for the balloon and that wouldn't have looked too enormous in a place that size. A bit of perspective at work there with the girl only just above head height and the balloon some way above. I wish I could find some pictures because they were really impressive. I might have some 'prints' in a box somewhere. (Stone age photography)
Edit: I seem to remember now that they were moving around with a small propellor. That could have provided some lift as well as propulsion. Battery life (even in those ancient times) would have been enough for a short performance. Health and safety must have been considered in that sort of project.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
I rummaged around in some old photos and I found this. Pretty well agrees with what we were thinking and I think it's pretty impressive. Not something to try outdoors!
balloon 1.jpg
 

Attachments

  • balloon 1.jpg
    balloon 1.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 912
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #10
@sophiecentaur The photo is so neat. And it agrees very much with our calculations. It looks like a somewhat heavy balloon material, so the combination of person plus balloon material may weigh a couple hundred pounds. That would mean a helium balloon volume of 100 m^3 or more. Thank you very much. :) ## \\ ## And a suggestion would be to enter the photo in one of the photo contests that Physics Forums has, where physics principles are being demonstrated.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K