Band diagram of intrinsic semiconductors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on sketching the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductors, specifically including the Fermi level under the influence of a uniform electric field. Participants clarify that the Fermi energy level is positioned between the conduction and valence bands, and the effect of the electric field results in a linear potential across the semiconductor. The correct approach involves drawing two lines representing the conduction and valence bands with a slope of -qE_field, where E_field is the applied electric field, and placing the Fermi level accordingly. This method is essential for understanding the behavior of intrinsic semiconductors in non-equilibrium conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of intrinsic semiconductors and their energy band structure
  • Familiarity with electric fields and their effects on semiconductor materials
  • Knowledge of Fermi level positioning in relation to conduction and valence bands
  • Basic grasp of potential energy concepts in semiconductor physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "band bending in semiconductors" to understand the effects of electric fields
  • Study "Fermi level in non-equilibrium conditions" for insights on quasi Fermi levels
  • Explore "energy band diagrams of semiconductors" for visual representations and examples
  • Learn about "n+p junctions and their interfaces" to comprehend boundary effects on band diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for interviews in semiconductor physics, electrical engineers designing semiconductor devices, and researchers studying the effects of electric fields on semiconductor materials.

shaikss
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
How to sketch the band diagram of intrinsic semiconductors including the fermi level with the electric field present verses distance? Its not a homework question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er.. your question is very vague. What exactly do you not know? A search on the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor would have given you plenty of results. Did you try it? If you did, where exactly are you having difficulties?

And what "electric field"?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er.. your question is very vague. What exactly do you not know? A search on the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor would have given you plenty of results. Did you try it? If you did, where exactly are you having difficulties?

And what "electric field"?

Zz.

Zapper,

I know the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor where Fermi energy level lies in the middle of conduction band and valence band. If we consider that characterstics, its the graph which is plotted w.r.t energy.

What I have asked is to sketch the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor which includes fermi level with uniform electric field verses distance.

I googled but I didn't found the relevant sketch.

Thanks!
 
shaikss said:
Zapper,

I know the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor where Fermi energy level lies in the middle of conduction band and valence band. If we consider that characterstics, its the graph which is plotted w.r.t energy.

What I have asked is to sketch the energy band diagram of intrinsic semiconductor which includes fermi level with uniform electric field verses distance.

I googled but I didn't found the relevant sketch.

Thanks!

I can only guess at what you are asking, because you are still not explaining it clearly.

Are you asking for the situation where a perpendicular electric field is applied to the surface of the semiconductor, and you want the effect on the semiconductor bands due to this external field from the surface and into the bulk of the material?

If it is, then you should be searching for "bend bending" diagram.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
I can only guess at what you are asking, because you are still not explaining it clearly.

Are you asking for the situation where a perpendicular electric field is applied to the surface of the semiconductor, and you want the effect on the semiconductor bands due to this external field from the surface and into the bulk of the material?

If it is, then you should be searching for "bend bending" diagram.

Zz.

please clarify me with respect to your second question.
The question i have posed was asked in an iit interview.
But i still do not find the answer
 
shaikss said:
please clarify me with respect to your second question.
The question i have posed was asked in an iit interview.
But i still do not find the answer

This is getting sillier. Now it is *I* who have to clarify what I thought you were asking?

1. Uniform E-field. I assume you know what that means.

2. Surface of semiconductor is perpendicular to this uniform E-field. Again, I assume you know what this is.

3. E-field affects the bands in the semiconductor. OK so far?

4. Is this what you are asking?

I think if I don't get a definite answer to what you are asking after this, I'm done.

Zz.
 
The energy bands are related to the electric potential through E=q*V where E is the energy, q the electron charge. If your Electric field E_{field} is constant through the device, then your potential, and thus your energy Bands will be linear in position. That is qV=-q\int^x_0 E_{field} dx'=-qE_{field}x=E_c + Const. where E_c is your conduction band, and the valence band is just E_v=E_c-E_g where E_g is the bandgap. So, just draw a straight line with a slope -qE_{field} to get the shape of your bands with respect to position in your semiconductor.
 
Let me pose the Question in this way:

Sketch the energy band diagram (E versus x) including Fermi level of an intrinsic semiconductor under uniform electric field in x-direction.
 
Just draw to lines )one for conduction band, one with the valence band)with a slope -qEfield, separated by a distance Eg. Then, since for an intrinsic case, the fermi level Ef is almost nearly right at the midgap, just draw a dotted line in between your bands with the same slope. You have to be careful though, since this is a quasi fermi level. By definition, when you apply a voltage (and hence create an Efield) you are taking the system out of equilibrium and putting it into a steady state. So, to get an exact answer, we need to know what is on either side of your device (n+p junction, metal-semiconductor interface, oxide and semiconductor interface, etc.). Then you would draw a constant fermi level at you boundries, and the difference in the two sides of your device wll give you the applied voltage time q (or -q*d*Efield, where d is the total depth or length of your device).
 
  • #10
cbetanco said:
Just draw to lines )one for conduction band, one with the valence band)with a slope -qEfield, separated by a distance Eg. Then, since for an intrinsic case, the fermi level Ef is almost nearly right at the midgap, just draw a dotted line in between your bands with the same slope. You have to be careful though, since this is a quasi fermi level. By definition, when you apply a voltage (and hence create an Efield) you are taking the system out of equilibrium and putting it into a steady state. So, to get an exact answer, we need to know what is on either side of your device (n+p junction, metal-semiconductor interface, oxide and semiconductor interface, etc.). Then you would draw a constant fermi level at you boundries, and the difference in the two sides of your device wll give you the applied voltage time q (or -q*d*Efield, where d is the total depth or length of your device).

Why the slope of -qE is required?
 
  • #11
shaikss said:
Why the slope of -qE is required?

Because the Energy of the bands is equal to qV+Const.. So, the conduction band for example is E_c=qV+Const.=-q\int_0^x E_{field} dx'+Const.=-qE_{field}x+Const. for a constant electric field, which I have denoted by E_{field}. The Valence band is just taken by E_v=E_c-E_g=-qE_{field}x -E_g+Const. where E_g is just the bandgap energy. So the slope of the bands is -qE_{field}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K