Bari's question at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing the surface area of a silo

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on optimizing the surface area of a silo designed to store 1000 ft³ of hay, which consists of a cylindrical base topped with a hemisphere. The volume formula is V = πr²h + (2/3)πr³, and the surface area formula is SA = 2πrh + 2πr². By applying calculus techniques, specifically related rates and optimization, the minimum surface area is achieved when the radius r is approximately 7.816 ft, with the height h being 0 ft, indicating that the optimal design is a dome shape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically related rates and optimization.
  • Familiarity with volume and surface area formulas for geometric shapes, particularly cylinders and hemispheres.
  • Knowledge of differentiation and critical point analysis in calculus.
  • Experience with Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in optimization problems.
  • Explore the geometric properties of cylinders and hemispheres in relation to volume and surface area.
  • Learn about the second derivative test for identifying extrema in calculus.
  • Investigate real-world applications of optimization in engineering and architecture.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, architects, and anyone interested in optimization problems in calculus and their practical applications in design and construction.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Can you solve this Calculus problem?


I need help.
Solve using Related Rates or Optimization.

Bob is building a silo to store 1000 ft^3 of hay. Find the minimum amount of material and the dimensions of the silo to achieve it. Since his silo is a cylinder topped with a hemisphere, the formulas are as follows:
V=pi x r^2 x h + (2/3)pi x r^3
SA= 2 x pi x r x h + 2 x pi x r ^2

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Bari,

The volume $V$ of the silo is given by:

$$V=\pi hr^2+\frac{2}{3}\pi r^3$$

The surface area $S$ is given by:

$$S=2\pi hr+2\pi r^2$$

Solving the first equation for $h$, we obtain:

$$h=\frac{3V-2\pi r^3}{3\pi r^2}$$

Substituting for $h$ into the second equation, we obtain the surface area as a function of one variable, $r$:

$$S(r)=2Vr^{-1}+\frac{2\pi}{3}r^2$$

Differentiating with respect to $r$ and equating the result to zero, we find:

$$S'(r)=-2Vr^{-2}+\frac{4\pi}{3}r=0$$

Solving for $r$, we obtain the critical value:

$$r=\left(\frac{3V}{2\pi} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}$$

Using the second derivative test to determine the nature of the extremum at this critical value, we find:

$$S''(r)=4Vr^{-3}+\frac{4\pi}{3}>0\,\forall\,0<r$$

Hence, the extremum is a minimum. And so the dimensions if the silo which minimizes the surface area are:

$$r=\left(\frac{3V}{2\pi} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}$$

$$h=\frac{3V-2\pi\left(\frac{3V}{2\pi} \right)}{3\pi\left(\frac{3V}{2\pi} \right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}=0$$

Another method we could use is optimization with constraint, via Lagrange multipliers.

We have the objective function:

$$S(h,r)=2\pi hr+2\pi r^2$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(h,r)=\pi hr^2+\frac{2}{3}\pi r^3-V=0$$

which yields the system:

$$2\pi r=\lambda\left(\pi r^2 \right)\implies \lambda=\frac{2}{r}$$

$$2\pi h+4\pi r=\lambda\left(2\pi hr+2\pi r^2 \right)\implies \lambda=\frac{h+2r}{r(h+r)}$$

This implies:

$$\frac{2}{r}=\frac{h+2r}{r(h+r)}$$

$$2hr+2r^2=hr+2r^2$$

$$hr=0$$

We know $r\ne0$, hence we must have $h=0$, and so the constraint becomes:

$$\frac{2}{3}\pi r^3-V=0\implies r=\left(\frac{3V}{2\pi} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}$$

Note: The fact the $h=0$ follows from the fact that a spherical shape encloses more volume per surface area than a cylinder, and so the silo winds up simply being a dome.

Now, using the given data:

$$V=1000\text{ ft}^3$$

the dimensions we seek are:

$$r=\left(\frac{3\cdot1000\text{ ft}^3}{2\pi} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}=\sqrt[3]{\frac{1500}{\pi}}\text{ ft}\approx7.816\text{ ft}$$

$$h=0\text{ ft}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K