Barrier Tunneling in Scanning Tunneling Microscope: Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Tunneling
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
I have some questions about barrier tunneling in a scanning tunneling microscope.

From what I know, the microscope consists of a one atom tip very close to the surface of the metal being examined. A potential difference is applied between the tip and the metal and some of the electrons manage to tunnel through the vacuum.

1) How is the potential energy barrier to the electrons formed with a vacuum?

2) How do physicists determine the energy of the electron at the negative electrode?

Could you also please give mathematical equations for barrier tunneling for cases like that of the ST Microscope where the barrier is not an electric or magnetic barrier?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gokul43201 said:
Try this :

http://www.chembio.uoguelph.ca/educmat/chm729/STMpage/stmdet.htm

It's not the absolute energy but the energy difference that's important. This is simply eV, where V is the bias voltage.

Thank you.

An equation I got for the transmission coefficient(T) from Resnick-Halliday says that
T = e^-(2kl) where k is proportional to the energy difference.

Does this mean that the higher the voltage applied between the surface and the tip, the lower is the transmission coefficient?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top